Cited by 75Sports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Early Phase Differential Effects of Slow and Fast Barbell Squat Training

Morrissey, Matthew C., Harman, Everett A., Frykman, Peter N., Ki Hoon Han·1998·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

To examine the importance of resistance training movement speed, two groups of women (24 +/- 4 years, 162 +/- 5 cm, 59 +/- 7 kg) squatted repeatedly at 1) 2 seconds up, 2 seconds down (slow, N = 11); or 2) 1 second up, 1 second down (fast, N = 10), doing three warm-up sets and three eight-repetition maximum sets, three times per week for 7 weeks. Tests included force platform and video analysis of the vertical jump, long jump, and maximum squat, and isometric and isokinetic knee extensor testing at speeds from 25 to 125 deg/sec. The groups improved similarly in many variables with training but also showed some differences. In the long jump, the fast group was superior in numerous variables including knee peak velocity and total-body vertical and absolute power. In the vertical jump, fast training affected the ankle and hip more (e.g., average power), and slow training mostly affected the knee (average torque). In isokinetic testing, the fast group improved strength most at the faster velocities, while the slow group strength changes were consistent across the velocities tested. Although both slow and fast training improved performance, faster training showed some advantages in quantity and magnitude of training effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03635465980260021101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies have equated work volume between different training groups.

    “Thus, few studies have equated work volume between the diff erent training groups [ 10 , 17 , 19 , 25 , 26 , 40 ]”
  • Some isoinertial studies comparing fast- vs. slow-velocity training on strength found greater strength gains when performing repetitions at fast velocities.

    “some found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
  • A plausible explanation for why several studies did not find superior strength gains when lifting loads faster is that in most of them repetitions were performed to or next to muscle failure.

    “A plausible explanation to why several studies did not fi nd superior strength gains when lifting loads faster may be that in most of them repetitions were performed to or next to muscle failure [ 2 , 9 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 40 ] .”
  • Some studies comparing fast vs intentionally slow movement velocities found greater strength gains when repetitions were performed at fast velocities.

    “Some of these studies found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
  • Most previous studies identified movement velocity with lifting cadence.

    “and most studies identifi ed movement velocity with lifting cadence [ 10 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 35 , 40 ]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrissey, M. C., Harman, E. A., Frykman, P. N., & Han, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
1998-03
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
221-230
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W1960306033
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for Physical Therapy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
barbell squat, resistance training, movement speed, fast training, women, vertical jump, long jump, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, knee extensors, training effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Joints, Muscle Contraction, Orthopedic Equipment, Physical Education and Training, Weight Lifting, Torque

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review