Cited by 157Digital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment and Welfare StudiesLegal and Labor Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Über-Alienated: Powerless and Alone in the Gig Economy

Open access
Glavin, Paul, Bierman, Alex, Schieman, Scott·2021·Work and Occupations

Abstract

While the gig economy has expanded rapidly in the last decade, few have studied the psychological ramifications of working for an online labor platform. Guided by classical and modern theories of work and alienation, we investigate whether engagement in platform work is associated with an increased sense of powerlessness and isolation. We analyze data from two national surveys of workers from the Canadian Quality of Work and Economic Life Study in September 2019 ( N = 2,460) and March 2020 ( N = 2,469). Analyses reveal greater levels of powerlessness and loneliness among platform workers—a pattern that is not fully explained by their higher levels of financial strain. Additional analyses of platform activity reveal that rideshare driving is more strongly associated with powerlessness and isolation than engagement in online crowdwork. We interpret our findings in light of platform firms’ use of algorithmic control and distancing strategies that may undermine worker autonomy and social connection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07308884211024711

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Berg J., 2016, Comp. Labor Law Policy Journal, 37, 543
  2. Calo R., 2017, Colum. L. Rev, 117, 1623
  3. Corporaal G. F., 2017, Platform sourcing: How fortune 500 firms are adopting online freelancing platforms
  4. De Stefano V., 2016, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37, 471
  5. Farrell D., Greig F. (2016). Paychecks, paydays, and the online platform economy. In Proceedings annual conference on taxation and minutes of the annual meeting of the national tax association (Vol. 109, pp. 1–40). National Tax Association.
  6. Kessler S., 2018, Gigged: The end of the job and the future of work
  7. Marx K., 2009, The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and the communist manifesto
  8. Mayo E. (1949). Hawthorne and the Western electric company. In Public administration: Concepts and case s (pp. 149–158). Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Rosenblat A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758
  10. Swain D., 2012, Alienation: An introduction to Marx’s theory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Glavin, Paul
Venue
Work and Occupations
Published
2021-06-22
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
399-431
ISSN
  • 0093-9285 (ISSN-L)
  • 0730-8884
  • 1552-8464
OpenAlex
W3173882469
Cited by
157
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
FWCI
27.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Work and Occupations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
gig economy, platform work, alienation, powerlessness, loneliness, social isolation, algorithmic control, employee autonomy, financial stress, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review