Cited by 286Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Review of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II)

McCrimmon, Adam W., Smith, Amanda D.·2013·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734282912467756

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCrimmon, A. W., & Smith, A. D.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2012-12-05
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
337-341
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
OpenAlex
W2317295479
Cited by
286
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
WASI, intelligence testing, cognitive assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review