Cited by 23Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Measuring Engagement in Later Life Activities: Rasch-Based Scenario Scales for Work, Caregiving, Informal Helping, and Volunteering

Ludlow, Larry H., Matz-Costa, Christina, Johnson, Clair, Brown, Melissa, Besen, Elyssa, James, Jacquelyn B.·2014·Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Abstract

The development of Rasch-based “comparative engagement scenarios” based on Guttman’s facet theory and sentence mapping procedures is described. The scenario scales measuring engagement in work, caregiving, informal helping, and volunteering illuminate the lived experiences of role involvement among older adults and offer multiple advantages over typical Likert-based scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0748175614522273

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Rasch/Guttman Scenario approach to instrument construction begins by breaking down a complex construct into its characteristics, or facets.

    “As mentioned above, the Rasch/Guttman Scenario approach to instrument construction begins by breaking down a complex construct (like meaning-making) into its characteristics, or facets (Ludlow et al. 2014, 2020).”

    From A Reframing of Meaning-Making and Its Measurement Among Emerging Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Ludlow et al. 2014

  • The items should measure a single construct and range from lower to higher levels of the construct.

    “The items should measure a single construct and range from lower to higher levels of the construct;”

    From A Reframing of Meaning-Making and Its Measurement Among Emerging Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Ludlow et al. 2014

  • The a priori underlying theory of the construct should be reflected in the empirical results.

    “The a priori underlying theory of the construct should be reflected in the empirical results.”

    From A Reframing of Meaning-Making and Its Measurement Among Emerging Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Ludlow et al. 2014

  • The items should define a clear, substantively meaningful, hierarchical progression with respect to the construct.

    “The items should define a clear, substantively meaningful, hierarchical progression with respect to the construct; and”

    From A Reframing of Meaning-Making and Its Measurement Among Emerging Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Ludlow et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ludlow, L. H., Matz-Costa, C., Johnson, C., Brown, M., Besen, E., & James, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (US)
Venue
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Published
2014-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
127-149
ISSN
  • 0748-1756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-6302
OpenAlex
W2141366843
Cited by
22
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
Rasch measurement, role involvement, older adults, work engagement, caregiving, informal helping, volunteering, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review