Cited by 291Child Abuse and TraumaBullying, Victimization, and AggressionCrime Patterns and Interventions

Effects of Poly-Victimization on Adolescent Social Support, Self-Concept, and Psychological Distress

Turner, Heather A., Shattuck, Anne, Finkelhor, David, Hamby, Sherry·2017·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Past research has demonstrated the particularly damaging effects of exposure to multiple forms of victimization, or “poly-victimization,” on youth mental health. The primary objective of the present study is to begin to identify the mechanisms that help explain its powerful impact. Analyses are based on two waves of longitudinal data from the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence (NatSCEV), conducted in 2008 and 2010, that comprised a telephone sample of 1,186 youth ages 10 to 17. Using structural equation modeling, we examine direct and indirect effects on distress symptoms of increased, decreased, and stable high poly-victimization between Waves 1 and 2 compared to no or low victimization in both waves. Specifically, we consider the extent to which reductions in core psychosocial resources, including family support, peer support, self-esteem, and mastery, mediate the relationship between these poly-victimization conditions and distress. Relative to stable low victimization, both increased poly-victimization and stable high poly-victimization were associated with declines in all four resources. However, only self-esteem and mastery significantly mediated the association between poly-victimization and distress, with mastery showing the strongest effect. Although significant indirect effects were evident, poly-victimization still had a strong direct effect on distress with resource factors controlled. Findings support the hypothesis that the potent effect of poly-victimization on youth mental health is, in part, due to its damaging influence on core psychosocial resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260515586376

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A., Finkelhor, D., & Hamby, S.
Affiliations
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
  • Sewanee: The University of the South (US)
Corresponding author
Turner, Heather A.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
755-780
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W1531772863
Cited by
291
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
polyvictimization, adolescent mental health, psychological distress, social support, self-concept, self-esteem, mastery, family support, peer support, mediation
MeSH terms
Exposure to Violence, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review