Cited by 54Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The relationship between child sexual abuse, self-concept and psychopathology: The moderating role of social support and perceived parental quality

Gewirtz-Meydan, Ateret·2020·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104938

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gewirtz-Meydan, A.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
113
Pages
104938
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012104434
Cited by
54
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
child sexual abuse, self-concept, psychopathology, social support, moderating effect, child development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review