Cited by 87Child Abuse and TraumaOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Examining perceived stress, childhood trauma and interpersonal trauma in individuals with drug addiction

Garami, Julia, Valikhani, Ahmad, Parkes, Denise, Haber, Paul, Mahlberg, Justin, Misiak, Blazej, Frydecka, Dorota, Moustafa, Ahmed A.·2019·Psychological Reports

Abstract

The investigation of psychosocial factors in relation to opiate addiction is limited and typically uses binary measures to assess how incidences of childhood trauma correlate with addiction. There has also been a lack of enquiry into how experiences of noninterpersonal versus interpersonal trauma may impact drug use addiction. In this regard, the current study utilized a novel measurement of interpersonal versus noninterpersonal lifetime trauma and a scale assessing severity of childhood trauma to examine how these factors may impact patients with opioid addiction. The interaction between these factors and current perceived stress was also examined. Thirty-six opioid-dependent individuals (recruited from the Drug Health Services and Opioid Treatment Program at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia) and 33 healthy controls completed the Childhood Maltreatment Questionnaire, Lifetime Trauma Survey, and Perceived Levels of Stress Scale. The patient group reported significantly greater childhood trauma severity, more incidences of lifetime trauma, and higher perceived stress than controls. Logistic regression analyses indicated that the severity of childhood trauma was more strongly associated with addiction status than perceived stress. A greater number of lifetime trauma incidence was the best predictor of addiction. Contrary to expectations, noninterpersonal lifetime trauma was a better predictor of addiction status than was interpersonal lifetime trauma. Results suggest that lifetime trauma and childhood trauma may play an important factor in opioid addiction over what can be accounted for by stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0033294118764918

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garami, J., Valikhani, A., Parkes, D., Haber, P., Mahlberg, J., Misiak, B., Frydecka, D., & Moustafa, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Shiraz University (IR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Uniwersytet Medyczny im Piastow Slaskich we Wroclawiu, Wroclaw, Dolnoslaskie, Poland
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
Corresponding author
Garami, Julia
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
433-450
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W2789372449
Cited by
87
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, drug addiction, childhood trauma, perceived stress, interpersonal trauma, lifetime trauma, injury severity, psychosocial risk factors
MeSH terms
Physical Abuse, Psychological Trauma, Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review