Cited by 40Child Abuse and TraumaResilience and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The Mediating Role of Distress Tolerance in the Relationship Between Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Outcomes Among University Students

Open access
Robinson, Martin, Ross, Jana, Fletcher, Shelley, Burns, Carol Rhonda, Lagdon, Susan, Armour, Cherie·2021·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

A wealth of empirical literature has documented that the experience of childhood maltreatment is related to an increased risk for the development of psychopathologies in adulthood. Empirical studies examining the factors that could possibly explain this relationship, however, remain sparse. The emerging literature on distress tolerance (DT) suggests that it could possibly act as an explanatory or mediating factor within this relationship. The current study, therefore, examined the mediating role of DT in the relationship between childhood maltreatment and psychopathology (posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and alcohol use) in adulthood in a university student population sample ( N = 642). Results showed that childhood maltreatment was positively associated with caseness for all mental health outcomes under investigation. It was also found that individuals with higher levels of DT were less likely to experience adverse mental health outcomes. The results of the mediation analysis indicated that the exposure to childhood maltreatment remained associated with elevated risk for being in the symptomatic group across mental health outcomes, and that DT significantly mediated this relationship. These results provide insight into the relationship between childhood maltreatment and mental ill-health later in life, highlighting the importance of considering DT as a potential risk and resilience factor in this relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260519835002

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, M., Ross, J., Fletcher, S., Burns, C. R., Lagdon, S., & Armour, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
36
Issue
15-16
Pages
7249-7273
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2922034580
Cited by
40
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
child abuse, distress tolerance, mediation, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, alcohol consumption, university students, resilience, mental health outcomes, adult psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Students, Universities, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review