Cited by 105Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The Role of Distress Tolerance in the Use of Specific Emotion Regulation Strategies

Jeffries, Emily R., McLeish, Alison C., Kraemer, Kristen M., Avallone, Kimberly M., Fleming, John B.·2016·Behavior Modification

Abstract

The present study evaluated the role of distress tolerance (DT), defined as the ability to tolerate negative emotional states, in the use of four specific emotion regulation strategies (suppression, avoidance, rumination, and reappraisal). Undergraduate psychology students (N = 431, 71.7% female; Mage = 19.80 years, SD= 3.71) completed self-report measures online for course credit. It was hypothesized that, after controlling for the effects of anxiety sensitivity and negative affectivity, DT would be negatively associated with suppression, avoidance, and rumination, and positively associated with reappraisal. Consistent with prediction, low DT significantly predicted greater use of suppression, avoidance, and rumination. However, contrary to prediction, DT did not significantly predict reappraisal. These results suggest that individuals who are unable to withstand negative emotions are more likely to use maladaptive regulation strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445515619596

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeffries, E. R., McLeish, A. C., Kraemer, K. M., Avallone, K. M., & Fleming, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
McLeish, Alison C.
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2015-12-08
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
439-451
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2216480565
Cited by
105
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr026314-03)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1-RR026314)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
distress tolerance, emotion regulation strategies, emotional suppression, avoidance, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, anxiety sensitivity, negative affectivity, maladaptive emotion regulation, negative emotions
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review