Cited by 114Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

The Relationship between Age and Depressive Symptoms: A Test of Competing Explanatory and Suppression Influences

Schieman, Scott, van Gundy, Karen, Taylor, John·2002·Journal of Aging and Health

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to examine competing explanatory and suppression influences on a negative, linear association between age and depressive symptoms. Methods:Two samples were used: a community sample of physically disabled individuals and a comparison sample matched on age, sex, and area of residence. Results:Fewer economic hardships and fewer experiences of negative interpersonal exchanges among older disabled and nondisabled respondents account for the negative relationship between age and depressive symptoms. Higher scores on a composite measure of religiosity among older disabled adults also account for part of the negative age effect. Conversely, a lower sense of mastery among older respondents in both samples suppresses the size of the negative age slope. Discussion:Findings are discussed in terms of stress process and socioemotional selectivity theories, which predict that personal and social arrangements influence the experience of emotions differentially across the life course.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/089826430201400205

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 25 highest-rigor studies on R/S and self-esteem, 17 (68%) reported greater self-esteem and two (8%) found worse self-esteem.

    “Of the 25 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 17 (68%) reported greater self-esteem [91–98] and two (8%) found worse self-esteem [99, 100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schieman, S., van Gundy, K., & Taylor, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of New Hampshire
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Aging and Health
Published
2002-05
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
260-285
ISSN
  • 0898-2643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6887
OpenAlex
W2167210173
Cited by
114
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Aging and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
depressive symptoms, age, older adults, physical disability, economic hardship, interpersonal relationships, religiosity, sense of mastery, stress process theory, socioemotional selectivity theory, life course
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Depression, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review