Cited by 130Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Social Capital and Loneliness Among the Very Old Living at Home and in Institutional Settings: A Comparative Study

Nyqvist, Fredrica, Cattan, Mima, Andersson, Lars, Forsman, Anna K., Gustafson, Yngve·2013·Journal of Aging and Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between aspects of social capital and loneliness among the very old living at home and in institutional settings. METHOD: Half of those aged 85 years, and all 90- and 95-year-olds and older in urban and rural municipalities in northern Sweden and western Finland were invited to participate in a cross-sectional population-based study in 2005-2007. A sample of 483 participants who completed the study was included in the analyses. RESULTS: Loneliness was experienced by 55% percent of those living in institutional settings often or sometimes and 45% of those living in their own homes. Loneliness was closely related to living alone, to depression, and to region (northern Sweden). DISCUSSION: Social capital and loneliness are context dependent (i.e., geographical or living environment). Among the very old, the link between social capital resources and loneliness is also highly influenced by health status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0898264313497508

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyqvist, F., Cattan, M., Andersson, L., Forsman, A. K., & Gustafson, Y.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Aging and Health
Published
2013-08-29
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1013-1035
ISSN
  • 0898-2643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6887
OpenAlex
W2105306662
Cited by
130
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Aging and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
social capital, loneliness, oldest old, institutionalized elderly, living at home, living alone, depression, regional variation, health status, urban-rural differences
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Finland, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Institutionalization, Loneliness, Male, Risk Factors, Social Support, Sweden, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review