Cited by 106Cognitive Functions and MemorySleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remembering to Execute a Goal: Sleep on It!

Scullin, Michael K., McDaniel, Mark A.·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

Remembering to execute deferred goals (prospective memory) is a ubiquitous memory challenge, and one that is often not successfully accomplished. Could sleeping after goal encoding promote later execution? We evaluated this possibility by instructing participants to execute a prospective memory goal after a short delay (20 min), a 12-hr wake delay, or a 12-hr sleep delay. Goal execution declined after the 12-hr wake delay relative to the short delay. In contrast, goal execution was relatively preserved after the 12-hr sleep delay relative to the short delay. The sleep-enhanced goal execution was not accompanied by a decline in performance of an ongoing task in which the prospective memory goal was embedded, which suggests that the effect was not a consequence of attentional resources being reallocated from the ongoing task to the prospective memory goal. Our results suggest that consolidation processes active during sleep increase the probability that a goal will be spontaneously retrieved and executed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610373373

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Derogatis L.R., 1977, SCL-90: Administration, scoring, and procedure manual - I
  2. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Horne J.A., 1976, International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97

Metadata

Authors
Scullin, M. K., & McDaniel, M. A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Scullin, Michael K.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-06-02
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
1028-1035
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2158528169
Cited by
106
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
prospective memory, sleep, memory consolidation, spontaneous retrieval, attentional resources, task embeddings
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Goals, Humans, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Semantics, Sleep, Students, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review