Cited by 29Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and Influences

Consolidation of Prospective Memory: Effects of Sleep on Completed and Reinstated Intentions

Open access
Barner, Christine, Seibold, Mitja, Born, Jan, Diekelmann, Susanne·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Sleep has been shown to facilitate the consolidation of prospective memory, which is the ability to execute intended actions at the appropriate time in the future. In a previous study, the sleep benefit for prospective memory was mainly expressed as a preservation of prospective memory performance under divided attention as compared to full attention. Based on evidence that intentions are only remembered as long as they have not been executed yet (cf. 'Zeigarnik effect'), here we asked whether the enhancement of prospective memory by sleep vanishes if the intention is completed before sleep and whether completed intentions can be reinstated to benefit from sleep again. In Experiment 1, subjects learned cue-associate word pairs in the evening and were prospectively instructed to detect the cue words and to type in the associates in a lexical decision task (serving as ongoing task) 2 h later before a night of sleep or wakefulness. At a second surprise test 2 days later, sleep and wake subjects did not differ in prospective memory performance. Specifically, both sleep and wake groups detected fewer cue words under divided compared to full attention, indicating that sleep does not facilitate the consolidation of completed intentions. Unexpectedly, in Experiment 2, reinstating the intention, by instructing subjects about the second test after completion of the first test, was not sufficient to restore the sleep benefit. However, in Experiment 3, where subjects were instructed about both test sessions immediately after learning, sleep facilitated prospective memory performance at the second test after 2 days, evidenced by comparable cue word detection under divided attention and full attention in sleep participants, whereas wake participants detected fewer cue words under divided relative to full attention. Together, these findings show that for prospective memory to benefit from sleep, (i) the intention has to be active across the sleep period, and (ii) the intention should be induced in temporal proximity to the initial learning session.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02025

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhancing effects of sleep appeared particularly pronounced for prospective memories of plans in some cases, whereas other studies failed to demonstrate similar effects.

    “enhancing effects of sleep appeared to be particularly pronounced for prospective memories of plans in some cases, 30,31 whereas other studies on salient prospective memory failed to demonstrate similar effects.”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Abel T. Havekes R. Saletin J. M. Walker M. P. Hansen R. T. Ferri S. L. (2013). Sleep, plasticity and memory from molecules to whole-brain networks. Curr. Biol. 23 R774– R788. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.025 24028961 PMC4263505 · DOI
  2. Beck S. M. Ruge H. Walser M. Goschke T. (2014). The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia 52 37– 50. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.020 24200918 · DOI
  3. Bugg J. M. Scullin M. K. (2013). Controlling intentions: the surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Psychol. Sci. 24 2463– 2471. 10.1177/0956797613494850 24091550 · DOI
  4. Bugg J. M. Scullin M. K. McDaniel M. A. (2013). Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20 522– 527. 10.3758/s13423-013-0378-3 23355044 PMC3669231 · DOI
  5. Buhry L. Azizi A. H. Cheng S. Buhry L. Azizi A. H. Cheng S. (2011). Reactivation, replay, and preplay: how it might all fit together. Neural Plast. 2011: 203462 10.1155/2011/203462 PMC3171894 21918724 · DOI
  6. Burgess P. W. Dumontheil I. Gilbert S. J. (2007). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 290– 298. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.004 17548231 · DOI
  7. Burgess P. W. Scott S. K. Frith C. D. (2003). The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia 41 906– 918. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00327-5 12667527 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Craik F. I. M. Govoni R. Naveh-Benjamin M. Anderson N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125 159– 180. 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159 8683192 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Diekelmann S. Born J. (2010). The memory function of sleep. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 114– 126. 10.1038/nrn2762 20046194 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Diekelmann S. Wilhelm I. Wagner U. Born J. (2013a). Sleep improves prospective remembering by facilitating spontaneous-associative retrieval processes. PLoS ONE 8: e77621 10.1371/journal.pone.0077621 PMC3797070 24143246 · DOI
  11. Drosopoulos S. Schulze C. Fischer S. Born J. (2007). Sleep’s function in the spontaneous recovery and consolidation of memories. J. Exp. Psychol. 136 169– 183. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.169 17500644 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Einstein G. O. McDaniel M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16 717– 726. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717 2142956 · DOI
  13. Fernandes M. Guild E. (2009). Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 63 24– 32. 10.1037/a0012870 19271812 · DOI
  14. Gilbert S. J. Hadjipavlou N. Raoelison M. (2013). Automaticity and control in prospective memory: a computational model. PLoS ONE 8: e59852 10.1371/journal.pone.0059852 PMC3610891 23555807 · DOI
  15. Goschke T. Kuhl J. (1993). Representation of intentions: persisting activation in memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19 1211– 1226. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1211 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hoddes E. Zarcone V. Smythe H. Phillips R. Dement C. W. (1973). Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach. Psychophysiology 10 431– 436. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00801.x 4719486 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Igloi K. Gaggioni G. Sterpenich V. Schwartz S. Adcock R. Thangavel A. (2015). A nap to recap or how reward regulates hippocampal-prefrontal memory networks during daytime sleep in humans. Elife 4 507– 517. 10.7554/eLife.07903 PMC4721959 26473618 · DOI
  18. Iidaka T. Anderson N. D. Kapur S. Cabeza R. Craik F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in episodic memory revealed by positron emission tomography. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 267– 280. 10.1162/089892900562093 10771411 · DOI
  19. Ji D. Wilson M. A. (2007). Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 10 100– 107. 10.1038/nn1825 17173043 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Mäntylä T. Sgaramella T. (1997). Interrupting intentions: Zeigarnik-like effects in prospective memory. Psychol. Res. 60 192– 199. 10.1007/BF00419767 9342962 · DOI
  21. Marsh R. L. Hicks J. L. Bink M. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24 350– 361. 10.1037//0278-7393.24.2.350 · DOI
  22. Marsh R. L. Hicks J. L. Cook G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Mem. Cogn. 34 1037– 1045. 10.3758/BF03193250 17128602 · DOI
  23. Marsh R. L. Hicks J. L. Cook G. I. Hansen J. S. Pallos A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29 861– 870. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861 14516219 · DOI
  24. Marsh R. L. Hicks J. L. Watson V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28 652– 659. 10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.652 12109759 · DOI
  25. McDaniel M. A. Einstein G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 14 127– 144. 10.1002/acp.775 · DOI · Paper page
  26. McDaniel M. A. Quynn M. J. Einstein G. O. Breneiser J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30 605– 614. 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.605 15099129 · DOI
  27. Nowinski J. L. Dismukes K. (2005). Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: the importance of associative cueing. Memory 13 649– 657. 10.1080/09658210444000313 16076678 · DOI
  28. Paller K. A. Voss J. L. (2004). Memory reactivation and consolidation during sleep. Learn. Mem. 11 664– 670. 10.1101/lm.75704 15576883 PMC534694 · DOI
  29. Payne J. D. Kensinger E. A. (2010). Sleep’s Role in the consolidation of emotional episodic memories. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19 290– 295. 10.1177/0963721410383978 · DOI
  30. Payne J. D. Kensinger E. A. (2011). Sleep leads to changes in the emotional memory trace: evidence from fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23 1285– 1297. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21526 20521852 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Peyrache A. Khamassi M. Benchenane K. Wiener S. I. Battaglia F. P. (2009). Replay of rule-learning related neural patterns in the prefrontal cortex during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 12 919– 926. 10.1038/nn.2337 19483687 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pink J. E. Dodson C. S. (2013). Negative prospective memory: remembering not to perform an action. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20 184– 190. 10.3758/s13423-012-0337-4 23132608 · DOI
  33. Rechtschaffen A. Kales A. (1986). A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare - NIH, 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90021-2 · DOI
  34. Schwindel C. D. McNaughton B. L. (2011). Hippocampal–cortical interactions and the dynamics of memory trace reactivation. Prog. Brain Res. 193 163– 177. 10.1016/B978-0-444-53839-0.00011-9 21854962 · DOI
  35. Scullin M. K. Bugg J. M. (2013). Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39 965– 971. 10.1037/a0029198 22799284 PMC3598897 · DOI
  36. Scullin M. K. Bugg J. M. McDaniel M. A. (2012). Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory. Psychol. Aging 27 46– 53. 10.1037/a0026112 22082015 PMC3295914 · DOI
  37. Scullin M. K. Bugg J. M. McDaniel M. A. Einstein G. O. (2011). Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults. Mem. Cogn. 39 1232– 1240. 10.3758/s13421-011-0106-z PMC12320516 21557005 · DOI
  38. Scullin M. K. Einstein G. O. McDaniel M. A. (2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Mem. Cogn. 37 425– 433. 10.3758/MC.37.4.425 19460950 · DOI
  39. Scullin M. K. McDaniel M. A. Shelton J. T. (2013). The dynamic multiprocess framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability. Cogn. Psychol. 67 55– 71. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.001 23916951 PMC3809757 · DOI
  40. Skinner E. I. Fernandes M. A. Grady C. L. (2009). Memory networks supporting retrieval effort and retrieval success under conditions of full and divided attention. Exp. Psychol. 56 386– 396. 10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.386 19502200 · DOI
  41. Smith M. A. Roediger H. L. III. Karpicke J. D. (2013). Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39 1712– 1725. 10.1037/a0033569 23815513 · DOI
  42. Smith R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29 347– 361. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347 12776746 · DOI
  43. Smith R. E. Bayen U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30 756– 777. 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.756 15238021 · DOI
  44. Sprenger A. Weber F. D. Machner B. Talamo S. Scheffelmeier S. Bethke J. (2015). Deprivation and recovery of sleep in succession enhances reflexive motor behavior. Cereb. Cortex 25 4610– 4618. 10.1093/cercor/bhv115 26048955 PMC4816803 · DOI
  45. Walser M. Fischer R. Goschke T. (2012). The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 38 1030– 1044. 10.1037/a0027000 22288817 · DOI
  46. Walser M. Plessow F. Goschke T. Fischer R. (2013). The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychol. Res. 78 584– 596. 10.1007/s00426-013-0510-z 23918213 · DOI
  47. Walter S. Meier B. (2014). How important is importance for prospective memory? A review. Front. Psychol. 5: 657 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00657 PMC4071817 25018743 · DOI
  48. Walter S. Meier B. (2016). Social importance enhances prospective memory: evidence from an event-based task. Memory 1– 7. 10.1080/09658211.2016.1221973 [Epub ahead of print]. 27531122 · DOI
  49. Wilhelm I. Metzkow-Mészàros M. Knapp S. Born J. (2012). Sleep-dependent consolidation of procedural motor memories in children and adults: the pre-sleep level of performance matters. Dev. Sci. 15 506– 515. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01146.x 22709400 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Wilson M. A. McNaughton B. L. (1994). Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265 676– 679. 10.1126/science.8036517 8036517 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barner, C., Seibold, M., Born, J., & Diekelmann, S.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Barner, Christine
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-01-06
Volume
7
Pages
2025-2025
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2571202564
Cited by
29
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TR-SFB 654)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
prospective memory, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, Zeigarnik effect, divided attention, lexical decision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review