Don’t Look at My Answer: Subjective Uncertainty Underlies Preschoolers’ Exclusion of Their Least Accurate Memories
Abstract
Preschoolers’ ability to introspect and make decisions on the basis of these introspections has traditionally been questioned. The present research introduces a novel paradigm to examine the development of the connection between subjective uncertainty about memory and decision making in preschoolers. Three-, 4-, and 5-year-olds ( N = 81) encoded items presented once or twice. They then completed a forced-choice test, provided confidence judgments for each response, and decided whether to select or exclude answers to be evaluated for the possibility of reward. Four- and 5-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, reported lower certainty for incorrect and weaker memories than for correct and stronger memories, and they judiciously excluded their least confident memories, which resulted in accuracy gains for selected memories; these findings highlight age-related improvements in introspection on memory accuracy. Among accurate responses only, even 3-year-olds excluded their least confident answers, which suggests that the connection between uncertainty and decision making precedes the ability to monitor memory accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kindergarten constitutes a crucial period of EF and MC development.
“From previous research we know that kindergarten (as part of the preschool education) constitutes a crucial period of EF and MC development (Hembacher & Ghetti, 2014;McCabe et al., 2004)”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Hembacher & Ghetti, 2014
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…require that people accurately monitor their mental states and processes (i.e., conduct metacognitive monitoring) and then translate the output of their monitoring into adaptive behavioral responses (i.e., exert metacognitive control; Flavell, 1979; Krebs & Roebers, 2010; Nelson & Narens, 1990).”
BackgroundMetacognition and consciousness
Koriat, A. (2007) · The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816789.012 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Infants ask for help when they know they don’t know
Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1515129113 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Identifying cultural differences in metacognition.
van der Plas, E., Zhang, S., Dong, K., Bang, D., Li, J., Wright, N. D., & Fleming, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0001209 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Kälin, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09306-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Resendes, T., Benchimol-Elkaim, B., Delisle, C., René, J.-L., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2021) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101117 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hembacher, E., & Ghetti, S.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1768-1776
- ISSN
- 0956-7976
- 1467-9280
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review