The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences
Abstract
Economic inequality in America is at historically high levels. Although most Americans indicate that they would prefer greater equality, redistributive policies aimed at reducing inequality are frequently unpopular. Traditional accounts posit that attitudes toward redistribution are driven by economic self-interest or ideological principles. From a social psychological perspective, however, we expected that subjective comparisons with other people may be a more relevant basis for self-interest than is material wealth. We hypothesized that participants would support redistribution more when they felt low than when they felt high in subjective status, even when actual resources and self-interest were held constant. Moreover, we predicted that people would legitimize these shifts in policy attitudes by appealing selectively to ideological principles concerning fairness. In four studies, we found correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Studies 2–4) evidence that subjective status motivates shifts in support for redistributive policies along with the ideological principles that justify them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015) have shown that subjective status is correlated with support for redistributive policies”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015)
In the citing paper
“and that experimentally altering subjective status leads to changes in such support.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015)
In the citing paper
“In both cases, lower subjective status was associated with stronger support for redistribution, even when actual resources and self‐interest were held constant.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015)
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“…may engage in conscious reasoning to legitimize their choices, evidence from classic studies of cognitive dissonance (e.g., Goethals & Reckman, 1973) and self-perception (e.g., Bem, 1972) suggests that when people change attitudes, they often believe that they had held the new attitudes originally.”
BackgroundSocial psychology: handbook of basic principles
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3595 · Cited by 4,970
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience.
Higgins, E. T. (1996) · Cited by 1,970
Gilens, M. (1999) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001 · Cited by 1,803
Socioeconomic Status and Health: What We Know and What We Don't
ADLER, N. E., & OSTROVE, J. M. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x · Cited by 1,643
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ross L., 1996, Values and knowledge, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 234
Turning a blind eye: Meritocracy moderates the impacts of social status on corruption perception
Tan, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, L., Dou, X., Gu, Z., Liang, Y., & Dang, J. (2020) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12731 · Cited by 12
Liang, J., Chen, X., Li, T., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595731 · Cited by 9
Romero‐Vidal, X. (2021) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2021.1978820 · Cited by 12
Schmitt, H. J., Black, A. L., Keefer, L. A., & Sullivan, D. (2022) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12592 · Cited by 12
Populist Attitudes, Subjective Social Status, and Resentment in Italy
Melli, G., & Scherer, S. (2024) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-024-03346-3 · Cited by 9
From Perceived Economic Inequality to Support for Redistribution: The Role of Meritocracy Perception
Tejero-Peregrina, L., Willis, G. B., Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Á., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2025) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.1013 · Cited by 11
Connor, P., Stancato, D. M., Yıldırım, U., Lee, S. M., & Chen, S. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103967 · Cited by 8
Tepe, M., Vanhuysse, P., & Lutz, M. (2020) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912920960232 · Cited by 9
High relational mobility is associated with perceiving more economic inequality in everyday life
Willis, G. B., Uchida, Y., García‐Castro, J. D., & Takemura, K. (2024) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12597 · Cited by 8
Trust and needles: how perceptions of inequality shape vaccination in South Korea
Han, S. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03858-w · Cited by 8
Social network heterogeneity promotes depolarization of multidimensional correlated opinions
Ojer, J., Starnini, M., & Pastor‐Satorras, R. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013207 · Cited by 12
“Moreover, this social classification is often strongly linked with the economic status, which substantially contributes to shaping political ideology [70].”
Economic segregation is associated with reduced concerns about economic inequality
Davidai, S., Goya‐Tocchetto, D., & Lawson, M. A. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49778-w · Cited by 8
Siltala, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2020.00028 · Cited by 11
Lee, J., & Stacey, M. (2023) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-023-00636-6 · Cited by 8
Support for unconditional basic income in Spain: A materialist or post‐materialist issue?
Guerendiain‐Gabás, I., de Montes, L. G., Bobowik, M., & Arnoso, M. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12934 · Cited by 8
Social mobility beliefs and attitudes toward redistribution: Potential explanatory mechanisms
Matamoros‐Lima, J., Galdi, S., Moya, M., & Willis, G. B. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13042 · Cited by 8
Where I stand and what I stand for: Subjective status, class, and redistribution
Melli, G., & Azzollini, L. (2025) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103210 · Cited by 9
Phillips, L. T., Tepper, S. J., Goya‐Tocchetto, D., Davidai, S., Ordabayeva, N., Mirza, M. U., Szászi, B., Day, M. V., Hauser, O., & Jachimowicz, J. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683251352048 · Cited by 65
Vuletich, H. A., Gray, K. J., & Payne, B. K. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13306 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPerception of Socioeconomic Status: A Meta-Analysis of Manipulations
Tan, J. J. X., & Tai, A. Y. E. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241305506 · Cited by 9
“To elicit high or low relative deprivation, participants are respectively assigned to the information that they have less or more CDI than other similar participants (Brown-Iannuzzi et al., 2014).”
Positive contact with working-class people reduces personal contribution to inequality
Vázquez, A., Sayans‐Jiménez, P., López‐Rodríguez, L., Lois, D., & Zagefka, H. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221108936 · Cited by 7
The open‐and‐shut case against inequality
Vandemoortele, J. (2019) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12484 · Cited by 7
Grecu, S.-P., Vrânceanu, E. S., & Chiriac, H. C. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14040226 · Cited by 7
Ideology and the Microfoundations of Conflict
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.001.0001 · Cited by 6
System justification makes income gaps appear smaller
Goya‐Tocchetto, D., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104646 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDing, Y., Wu, J., Ji, T., Chen, X., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104342 · Cited by 7
Personal Relative Deprivation and Locus of Control
Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., Chobthamkit, P., Yeung, V. W. L., Leung, F. Y. N., Asano, R., Beattie, P., Bernardo, A. B. I., Boonroungrut, C., Chang, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12980 · Cited by 7
Effects of group membership on adults' essentialism of ethnicity and SES
Zhu, T., & Scott, R. M. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104776 · Cited by 5
Golob, T., Gorišek, M., & Makarovič, M. (2023) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc13080181 · Cited by 5
Tan, J., Jachimowicz, J., Smerdon, D., & Hauser, O. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5rcmz · Cited by 5
Perception of Inequality and Social Mobility in Germany: evidence from the Inequality BarometerPreprint
Bellani, L., Bledow, N., Busemeyer, M. R., & Schwerdt, G. (2024) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48787/kops/352-2-cfv008hjmfig8 · Cited by 5
Wealth distribution and redistributive preferences: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment
Albacete, N., Fessler, P., & Lindner, P. (2025) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102741 · Cited by 4
The Gap Between Us: Income Inequality Reduces Social Affiliation in Dyadic Interactions
Stancato, D. M., Keltner, D. J., & Chen, S. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231164213 · Cited by 5
Salfate, S. V., & Stern, C. (2023) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12692 · Cited by 4
The Inequality Cycle: How Psychology Helps Keep Economic Inequality in Place
Galvan, M. J., & Payne, B. K. (2024) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214241246553 · Cited by 4
Self-citationSocioeconomic status self‐deception as a way to perpetuate classist societies
Melita, D., Alcañiz‐Colomer, J., Matamoros‐Lima, J., Ríos, S. A., & Moya, M. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13051 · Cited by 4
Hines, B., & Morrison, K. R. (2021) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2788 · Cited by 4
Normalizing necessity? Support networks and racial inequality in Namibia
Oppel, A. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105649 · Cited by 4
“As noted by Brown-Iannuzi et al., socioeconomic status can be constituted by ‘‘objective material resources ... commonly assessed by indicators of wealth, education, and occupational prestige” (Brown-Iannuzzi et al., 2015: 15).”
BackgroundSocial sampling shapes preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a national survey experiment
Sumaktoyo, N. G., Breunig, C., & Gaissmaier, W. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104341 · Cited by 4
Children of Communism: Former Party Membership and the Demand for Redistribution
Libman, A., & Popova, O. I. (2022) · Eastern European Economics · doi:10.1080/00128775.2023.2195833 · Cited by 4
Sending the elevator back down: a mutual constitution between vertical and horizontal inequality
Oppel, A. (2021) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-021-00162-1 · Cited by 4
Ferolino, A. J. P. (2018) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1017/prp.2018.6 · Cited by 4
Defining social class across time and between groupsPreprint
Cohen, D., Shin, F., Liu, X., Ondish, P., & Kraus, M. W. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kvgdz · Cited by 4
Chae, H., Dagnino, G. B., & Audia, P. G. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063241299401 · Cited by 3
Melli, G., & Azzollini, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1617413 · Cited by 5
Gassmann, F., & Timár, E. (2023) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102496 · Cited by 3
(Mis)perception in Social Mobility: Optimistic Bias for Personal (but not Societal) Mobility Beliefs
Matamoros‐Lima, J., Willis, G. B., Navarro‐Carrillo, G., & Moya, M. (2024) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2024.23 · Cited by 3
Ren, W. (2024) · Chinese Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/17544750.2024.2438041 · Cited by 3
Velandia-Morales, A., Vallejo, C. E. C., Salazar, S. G., & López‐López, W. (2025) · Acta Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.14718/acp.2025.28.2 · Cited by 3
“Estas diferencias en los resultados resaltan la importancia de considerar la clase social y el estatus social (objetivo/subjetivo) para entender el apoyo a las políticas redistributivas (Brown-Iannuzzi et al., 2015; Condon & Wichowsky, 2020; Duman, 2020; Fatke, 2018).”
InfluentialA Tale of Odds and Ratios: Political Preference Formation in Postindustrial Democracies
Wineroither, D. M., & Metz, R. (2021) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-021-00323-0 · Cited by 4
Kirsten, F., Botha, I., Biyase, M., & Pretorius, M. (2022) · Studies in Economics and Econometrics · doi:10.1080/03796205.2022.2126998 · Cited by 3
The Misestimation of Urban‒Rural Income Inequality in China
Cai, Y., Ding, Y., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-024-00444-y · Cited by 3
The subjective inequality scale : a new way to measure economic inequality
Schmalor, A. (2018) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0371137 · Cited by 3
Invisible Inequality Leads to Punishing the Poor and Rewarding the RichPreprint
Hauser, O., Kraft‐Todd, G., Rand, D. G., Nowak, M. A., & Norton, M. I. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3051673 · Cited by 3
Granz, E. L., & Burns, M. D. (2025) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2025.2480196 · Cited by 2
Personal Relative Deprivation, Not Subjective Status, Explains Support for Economic Redistribution
Reynolds, J., Lively, C. J., Day, M. V., McInnis, M., Ryan, M. D., & Baldwin, M. M. (2025) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506251349584 · Cited by 2
Han, S. (2026) · Japanese Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s1468109925100224 · Cited by 2
Yang, S., Guo, Y., Yu, F., Rao, T., Zhao, L., & Li-ying, X. (2018) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2018.02238 · Cited by 2
Essentialist Beliefs About Status-Related Social Categories in China
Zhu, T., Chang, X., Zhao, X., & Scott, R. M. (2025) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/00220221251319508 · Cited by 2
Making Sense of Class: A Commentary on Lott
Keefer, L. A., & Goode, C. (2016) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12114 · Cited by 2
The Politics of Part-Time Work: Gender, Employment Status, and Preferences for Redistribution
Pedulla, D. S., & Donnelly, M. J. (2020) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x20000653 · Cited by 2
“Brown-Iannuzzi et al. (2015) show, using laboratory experiments, that participants made to think that they are lower status take more redistributive positions.”
Lungu, L. (2022) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwac030 · Cited by 4
Hoogland, C. E. (2016) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · doi:10.13023/etd.2016.410 · Cited by 3
Zeng, Z., Bai, J., Yongyu, G. U. O., Yue, Z., & Yuting, G. U. (2022) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.01336 · Cited by 1
del Fresno‐Díaz, Á., de Lemus, S., & Willis, G. B. (2024) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2024.2344252 · Cited by 2
Naeronambul : The Progressive Paradox in Educational Inequality
Han, S. (2025) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.70063 · Cited by 1
The impact of trade openness on perceived income inequality: evidence from China
Liu, X., & Liu, T. (2025) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-025-02800-6 · Cited by 1
When marriage ends: Divorce and the erosion of conservative political alignment
Han, S. (2026) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2026.103137 · Cited by 1
Of Tax, Crime, and Happiness. An Interdisciplinary Research Review on Social Inequality
Pleinen, J. (2022) · Neue Politische Literatur · doi:10.1007/s42520-022-00413-2 · Cited by 1
Abdiraiymova, G. S. (2022) · The Journal of Psychology and Sociology · doi:10.26577/jpss.2022.v81.i2.011 · Cited by 1
Subjective class research in psychology of social class: Its contributions and deficiencies
Shenlong, Y. A. N. G., Tingting, R. A. O., Yu, F., & Yongyu, G. U. O. (2022) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.01883 · Cited by 2
“00 02 9v 1 al., 2014);而主观阶层研究取向将其单纯地简化为一种对自身等级的感知,则不免过于扁平 化。例如对于一个不谙世事的小学生而言,他可能还无法清晰地理解他自身在社会阶梯上的 等级,但是他所受到的教育、接触到的物质与文化资源以及日常互动的社会环境已经足以使 他初步具备了一套基于某一特定阶层而生成的文化心理系统,并会由此表现出特定的自我认 知、观念与行为。这表明阶层对个体的影响可能更多在于文化塑造而非等级感知。 而如果再结合社会学的视角来看,主观阶层的研究取向则更显现出它与宏观社会现实一 定程度上的脱节问题。当然,主观阶层研究取向是心理学研究者提出的,所以不可避免地承…”
Jiang, J., Liu, F., Zhou, L., Chen, L., & Jiang, C. (2023) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108521 · Cited by 1
Ferragina, E., Zola, A., Pasqualini, M., & Recchi, E. (2023) · Comparative European Politics · doi:10.1057/s41295-023-00369-x · Cited by 1
Belief Systems and Ideologies as Psychological Need Reconciliation
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Schuler, J., Ivanov, I., & Wänke, M. (2017) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i2.748 · Cited by 1
“Left-wing policies seek tominimize social hierarchies, support the interests of the disadvantaged, and fight for inclusion, redistribution, and equal rights (Edlund & Pande, 2002; Jæger, 2008; Shen & LaBouff, 2016) and are therefore supported by people with a lower subjective SES (Brown-Iannuzzi et al., 2015).”
InfluentialAccounting Education, Economics Education, and Opinions on Taxing the Wealthy
Routon, P. W., & Berry, R. L. (2018) · Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium · doi:10.1515/ael-2017-0041 · Cited by 1
When Inequality is Good for Groups: The Moderating Role of FairnessPreprint
Hart, E., & Piff, P. K. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3372685 · Cited by 1
In Pursuit of the American Dream: How Social Class Affects Future Possible Selves
Benedetti, A. H. (2019) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Mahlmeister, R. S. (2021) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.8.2021.tde-21032022-164521 · Cited by 1
Relative Deprivation and Cognate Theories
Conrique, B. G., & Crosby, F. J. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394266616.ch8 · Cited by 2
Conservative Self-EnhancementPreprint
Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2622348
Cultural Self 1: Class, Race, and Ethnicity
Brown, J. D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24505-4_4
Exploring economic support networks amidst racial inequality in Namibia
Oppel, A. (2021) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2021/042-9
Aspirations, inequality, and behavioral change: evidence from Colombia
Rojas-Mora, J. E. (2022) · Development Studies Research · doi:10.1080/21665095.2022.2025878
Политические предпочтения: эффект экономической уязвимости
Александрович, К. С., & Гасюкова, Е. Н. (2022) · Мир России · doi:10.17323/1811-038x-2022-31-1-138-161
Compilation and Development of Priming Materials for College Students’ Subjective Social Status
夏, 英. (2019) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2019.99195
High SES Against Redistribution
de Almeida-Segundo, D. S., & Sousa, R. S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1701-1
High SES Against Redistribution
de Almeida-Segundo, D. S., & Sousa, R. S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1701
Status and Redistribution of Resources
Keefer, L. A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1700
Status and Redistribution of Resources
Keefer, L. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1700-1
Where I Stand and What I Stand For. Subjective Social Status and Attitudes Towards RedistributionPreprint
Melli, G., & Azzollini, L. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/849g5
Oppel, A. (2023) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2023/394-9
Lois, G., Petkanopoulou, K., García‐Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d5m9q
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.003.0001
Real-life Cases and the Link between Needs, Ideology, and Conflict
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.003.0010 · Cited by 1
Right, Left, and Religious Ideologies
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.003.0007
From Individual Psychological Needs to Social and Political Conflicts
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.003.0002
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.003.0008
Müller, V., & Gries, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197670187.002.0007
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-11-21
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-26
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2098662075
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 36.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Russell Sage Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- subjective social status, redistribution, economic inequality, political preferences, self-interest, ideology, fairness, social comparison, policy attitudes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Politics, Public Policy, Social Class, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review