The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences
Abstract
Economic inequality in America is at historically high levels. Although most Americans indicate that they would prefer greater equality, redistributive policies aimed at reducing inequality are frequently unpopular. Traditional accounts posit that attitudes toward redistribution are driven by economic self-interest or ideological principles. From a social psychological perspective, however, we expected that subjective comparisons with other people may be a more relevant basis for self-interest than is material wealth. We hypothesized that participants would support redistribution more when they felt low than when they felt high in subjective status, even when actual resources and self-interest were held constant. Moreover, we predicted that people would legitimize these shifts in policy attitudes by appealing selectively to ideological principles concerning fairness. In four studies, we found correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Studies 2–4) evidence that subjective status motivates shifts in support for redistributive policies along with the ideological principles that justify them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015) have shown that subjective status is correlated with support for redistributive policies”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015)
In the citing paper
“and that experimentally altering subjective status leads to changes in such support.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015)
In the citing paper
“In both cases, lower subjective status was associated with stronger support for redistribution, even when actual resources and self‐interest were held constant.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Brown‐Iannuzzi, Lundberg, Kay, and Payne (2015)
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“…may engage in conscious reasoning to legitimize their choices, evidence from classic studies of cognitive dissonance (e.g., Goethals & Reckman, 1973) and self-perception (e.g., Bem, 1972) suggests that when people change attitudes, they often believe that they had held the new attitudes originally.”
BackgroundSocial psychology: handbook of basic principles
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3595 · Cited by 4,970
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience.
Higgins, E. T. (1996) · Cited by 1,970
Gilens, M. (1999) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001 · Cited by 1,803
Socioeconomic Status and Health: What We Know and What We Don't
ADLER, N. E., & OSTROVE, J. M. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x · Cited by 1,643
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ross L., 1996, Values and knowledge, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right
Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12319 · Cited by 966
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831
Tan, J. J. X., Kraus, M. W., Carpenter, N. C., & Adler, N. E. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000258 · Cited by 644
Populism as a Problem of Social Integration
Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2019) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019879947 · Cited by 530
Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life
Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616673192 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-11-21
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-26
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2098662075
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 36.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Russell Sage Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- subjective social status, redistribution, economic inequality, political preferences, self-interest, ideology, fairness, social comparison, policy attitudes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Politics, Public Policy, Social Class, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
