The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct-current stimulation does little to improve the outcome of working-memory training in older adults
Open accessAbstract
The promise of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a modulator of cognition has appealed to researchers, media, and the general public. Researchers have suggested that tDCS may increase effects of cognitive training. In this study of 123 older adults, we examined the interactive effects of 20 sessions of anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex (vs. sham tDCS) and simultaneous working memory training (vs. control training) on change in cognitive abilities. Stimulation did not modulate gains from pre- to posttest on latent factors of either trained or untrained tasks in a statistically significant manner. A supporting meta-analysis ( n = 266), including younger as well as older individuals, showed that, when combined with training, tDCS was not much more effective than sham tDCS at changing working memory performance ( g = 0.07, 95% confidence interval, or CI = [−0.21, 0.34]) and global cognition performance ( g = −0.01, 95% CI = [−0.29, 0.26]) assessed in the absence of stimulation. These results question the general usefulness of current tDCS protocols for enhancing the effects of cognitive training on cognitive ability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, in 123 older adults, Nilsson and colleagues (2017) found no additional benefit of stimulation on working memory training gains [48].”
From Primary outcome from the augmenting cognitive training in older adults study (ACT): A tDCS and cognitive training randomized clinical trial (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899 · Cited by 2,617
Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106291059 · Cited by 2,133
Nitsche, M. A., Fricke, K., Henschke, U., Schlitterlau, A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Henning, S. J., Tergau, F., & Paulus, W. (2003) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916 · Cited by 1,587
Fritsch, B., Reis, J., Martinowich, K., Schambra, H. M., Ji, Y., Cohen, L. G., & Lu, B. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035 · Cited by 1,420
Do “brain-training” programs work?
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100616661983 · Cited by 1,183
Is working memory training effective?
Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027473 · Cited by 1,101
Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635612 · Cited by 983
Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation
Stagg, C. J., Best, J. G., Stephenson, M. C., O’Shea, J., Wylezinska, M., Kincses, Z. T., Morris, P. G., Matthews, P. M., & Johansen‐Berg, H. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4432-08.2009 · Cited by 942
Synthesizing standardized mean‐change measures
Becker, B. J. (1988) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1988.tb00901.x · Cited by 889
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- McArdle J. J., 1994, Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions, 223
- R Core Team, 2016, R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.0)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Training Does Not Enhance General Cognition
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.004 · Cited by 303
Chu, C., Li, C., Brunoni, A. R., Yang, F., Tseng, P., Tu, Y., Stubbs, B., Carvalho, A. F., Thompson, T., Rajji, T. K., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-323870 · Cited by 156
Medina, J., & Cason, S. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.021 · Cited by 155
Teselink, J., Bawa, K. K., Koo, G. K., Sankhe, K., Liu, C. S., Rapoport, M. J., OH, P. I., Marzolini, S., Gallagher, D., Swardfager, W., et al. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101499 · Cited by 121
Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy and Clinical Populations
Berryhill, M. E., & Martin, D. M. (2018) · Journal of Ect · doi:10.1097/yct.0000000000000534 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilsson, J., Lebedev, A. V., Rydström, A., & Lövdén, M.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lövdén, Martin
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 907-920
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- PMC
- PMC5536199
- OpenAlex
- W2616004589
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet (446-2013-7189)
- European Research Council (617280 - REBOOT)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, working memory training, older adults, anodal tDCS, left prefrontal cortex, cognitive training, cognitive enhancement, global cognition, sham stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cognition, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Transfer, Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
