Cited by 27Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Working memory training coupled with transcranial direct current stimulation in older adults: a randomized controlled experiment

Open access
Teixeira-Santos, Ana C., Moreira, Célia S., Pereira, Diana R., Pinal, Diego, Fregni, Felipe, Leite, Jorge, Carvalho, Sandra, Sampaio, Adriana·2022·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been employed to boost working memory training (WMT) effects. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of this combination in older adults. The present study is aimed to assess the delayed transfer effects of tDCS coupled with WMT in older adults in a 15-day follow-up. We explored if general cognitive ability, age, and educational level predicted the effects. Methods: In this single-center, double-blind randomized sham-controlled experiment, 54 older adults were randomized into three groups: anodal-tDCS (atDCS)+WMT, sham-tDCS (stDCS)+WMT, and double-sham. Five sessions of tDCS (2 mA) were applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Far transfer was measured by Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM), while the near transfer effects were assessed through Digit Span. A frequentist linear mixed model (LMM) was complemented by a Bayesian approach in data analysis. Results: Working memory training improved dual n-back performance in both groups submitted to this intervention but only the group that received atDCS+WMT displayed a significant improvement from pretest to follow-up in transfer measures of reasoning (RAPM) and short-term memory (forward Digit Span). Near transfer improvements predicted gains in far transfer, demonstrating that the far transfer is due to an improvement in the trained construct of working memory. Age, formal education, and vocabulary score seem to predict the gains in reasoning. However, Bayesian results do not provide substantial evidence to support this claim. Conclusion: This study will help to consolidate the incipient but auspicious field of cognitive training coupled with tDCS in healthy older adults. Our findings demonstrated that atDCS may potentialize WMT by promoting transfer effects in short-term memory and reasoning in older adults, which are observed especially at follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2022.827188

Cites

70 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teixeira-Santos and colleagues (2022) demonstrated that intervention-related improvements on near-transfer tasks predicted improvements on an untrained reasoning task, suggesting that far-transfer effects are directly related to the enhancement of the trained construct.

    “Similarly, Teixeira-Santos and colleagues (2022) demonstrated that intervention-related improvements on near-transfer tasks predicted improvements on an untrained reasoning task, suggesting that far-transfer effects are directly related to the enhancement of the trained construct [46].”

    From Primary outcome from the augmenting cognitive training in older adults study (ACT): A tDCS and cognitive training randomized clinical trial (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior evidence shows enhanced cognitive performance in domains of working memory and episodic memory and evidence of transfer effects following active stimulation with cognitive training in older adults.

    “This is surprising given prior evidence of enhanced cognitive performance in domains of working memory and episodic memory and evidence of transfer effects following active stimulation with cognitive training in older adults [33–36, 46, 47].”

    From Primary outcome from the augmenting cognitive training in older adults study (ACT): A tDCS and cognitive training randomized clinical trial (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Results and Conclusion (no page numbers in our copy) report improved working-memory task performance and transfer to short-term memory and reasoning in older adults receiving active stimulation with training. They do not report an episodic-memory outcome; working-memory task performance also improved in the sham-stimulation training group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science, 2nd Edn. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  2. Wechsler D. (2008). WAIS-III: Escala de inteligência de Wechsler para adultos - Terceira edição. Manual técnico. [WAIS-III: Wechsler adult intelligence scale, 3rd Edn. London: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teixeira-Santos, A. C., Moreira, C. S., Pereira, D. R., Pinal, D., Fregni, F., Leite, J., Carvalho, S., & Sampaio, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • William James Center for Research (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Teixeira-Santos, Ana C.
  • Sampaio, Adriana
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2022-04-12
Volume
14
Pages
827188-827188
ISSN
1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223557510
Cited by
27
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositório da Universidade Portucalense (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundação Bial
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (POC-01-0145-FEDER-028682, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-032152, UID/PSI/01662/2019, SFRH/BD/80965/2011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, working memory training, older adults, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, far transfer, near transfer, cognitive training, reasoning, short-term memory, general intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review