Cited by 567Cultural Differences and ValuesCategorization, perception, and languageSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: The Social Orientation Hypothesis

Open access
Varnum, Michael E. W., Grossmann, Igor, Kitayama, Shinobu, Nisbett, Richard E.·2010·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

A large body of research documents cognitive differences between Westerners and East Asians. Westerners tend to be more analytic and East Asians tend to be more holistic. These findings have often been explained as being due to corresponding differences in social orientation. Westerners are more independent and Easterners are more interdependent. However, comparisons of the cognitive tendencies of Westerners and East Asians do not allow us to rule out alternative explanations for the cognitive differences, such as linguistic and genetic differences, as well as cultural differences other than social orientation. In this review we summarize recent developments that provide stronger support for the social orientation hypothesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721409359301

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Kraus M.W., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Medzheritskaya J., 2008, Paper presented at the 19th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology
  3. Naumov A.I., 1996, Management, 1, 70
  4. Oishi S., Perspectives on Psychological Science
  5. Šverko B.B., 1995, Life roles, values and careers, 225
  6. Triandis H.C., 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 37. Cross-cultural perspectives, 41
  7. Witkin H.A., 1975, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 567

Metadata

Authors
Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Varnum, Michael E. W.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2010-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
9-13
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2119537973
Cited by
566
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 23
FWCI
32.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG029509)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
cultural differences in cognition, social orientation, individualism-collectivism, cross-cultural cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review