CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPersonality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extraversion and Reward Processing

Smillie, Luke D.·2013·Current Directions in Psychological Science
DOI 10.1177/0963721412470133
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Reward processes have played an increasingly visible role in theories of extraverted personality. Reward processing is usually conceptualized in terms of the brain system responsible for generating incentive motivation and behavioral approach of rewarding stimuli, as in theories by Jeffrey Gray and Richard Depue. Recent increases in the accessibility of neuroscience methods have accelerated our understanding of the relationship between extraversion and neural processing of rewards. An issue that has remained somewhat neglected by this literature concerns the distinctions that have been made between reward desire and reward enjoyment. Higher-level abstractions of reward processing—identifiable in cognitive, social, and narrative approaches—have also received relatively little attention. These promising directions for future research may help further expand knowledge in this area of personality science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721412470133

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.245 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cooper A. J., 2013, Individual differences in reward prediction error: Contrasting relations between feedback related negativity and trait measures of extraversion, impulsivity and reward sensitivity
  3. Smillie L. D., Journal of Research in Personality

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 134

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Smillie, L. D.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Smillie, Luke D.
ORCID
Smillie, Luke D.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2013-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
167-172
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
DOI
10.1177/0963721412470133
OpenAlex
W2133237347
Cited by
134
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
extraversion, reward processing, incentive motivation, behavioral approach, personality neuroscience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review