Cited by 174Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGambling Behavior and Treatments

Neural reward processing is modulated by approach- and avoidance-related personality traits

Open access
Simon, Joe J., Walther, Stephan, Fiebach, Christian J., Friederich, Hans-Christoph, Stippich, Christoph, Weisbrod, Matthias, Kaiser, Stefan·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

The neural processing of reward can be differentiated into two sub-components with different functions, "wanting" (i.e., the expectation of a reward which includes appetitive and motivational components) and "liking" (i.e., the hedonic impact experienced during the receipt of a reward), involving distinct neural systems. We hypothesize that variability in neural reward processing previously observed in healthy subjects could reflect inter-individual differences in personality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate how the neural processing during expectation and reception of a reward depends on interpersonal differences in reward sensitivity, more specifically the tendency to approach vs. avoid reward-related situations. We employed event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging during a monetary incentive delay task. Subjects with a high approach motivation showed more activation of the Ventral Striatum (VS) during the receipt of a reward, and more medial orbitofrontal activity during both the receipt and omission of a reward. Subjects with a high behavioral inhibition showed less activation in the VS during the receipt of a reward. These findings indicate that the tendency to approach or avoid reward-related situations exhibits a distinct relation with neural reward processing. Specifically, subjects with high behavioral approach appear to be sensitive mainly to positive outcomes and to a lesser extent to the omissions of rewards, whereas subjects with low behavioral approach as well as those with a high inhibition tendency display a blunted response to rewards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.016

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental data suggest an association between risky and impulsive behavior, characteristic of ADHD, and dopamine release or dopamine-dependent BOLD response to rewards in the striatum.

    “Additionally, experimental data suggest an association between risky and impulsive behavior, which is characteristic of ADHD,14–16 and dopamine release or dopamine-dependent BOLD response to rewards in the striatum.11,17–20”
  • There is a positive association between trait impulsivity or reward-related impulsivity and neural activation in the striatum following reward-predicting cues in healthy adult samples.

    “First, there is a positive association between trait impulsivity or reward-related impulsivity and neural activation in the striatum following reward-predicting cues19,20,22 in healthy adult samples”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, J. J., Walther, S., Fiebach, C. J., Friederich, H.-C., Stippich, C., Weisbrod, M., & Kaiser, S.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Simon, Joe J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
1868-1874
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128957544
Cited by
174
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Emmy Noether grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG FI 848/3-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
approach motivation, avoidance motivation, personality traits, reward sensitivity, ventral striatum, medial orbitofrontal cortex, monetary incentive delay task, reward omission, individual differences, behavioral inhibition
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cues, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review