Cited by 69Mental Health and PsychiatryPsychological Treatments and DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Depression: The Shroud of Heterogeneity

Monroe, Scott M., Anderson, Samantha F.·2015·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Over the past several decades, depression has emerged as a major public health problem. Yet depression has not always represented such a prominent psychiatric condition, and the term depression has harbored different meanings over time. One widely agreed upon way of explaining such variation in what depression implies has been to describe depression as being heterogeneous. In the present article, depression is examined in relation to different types of heterogeneity, particularly with regard to the concept of a syndrome. The consequences of various meanings of heterogeneity for understanding the nature of depression are then explored. Finally, we speculate on the implications for the future of depression research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721414568342

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monroe, S. M., & Anderson, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2015-06
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
227-231
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2210298535
Cited by
68
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
30.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, depression heterogeneity, history of depression, psychiatric classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review