Cited by 220Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Moving forward: how depression heterogeneity hinders progress in treatment and research

Open access
Fried, EI·2017·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Few would argue that depression research in the last two decades has led to major improvements of clinical care for patients. The tools and insights we have at our disposal today have not changed m...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2017.1307737

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two individuals can meet criteria for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder without sharing any single symptom.

    “At the extreme, two individuals can meet criteria for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder without sharing any single symptom. 7”
  • A potential reason personalisation provides benefits over traditional machine learning is that it allows dealing with heterogeneity, a feature characteristic of depression and treatment response.

    “Revisiting the hypothesis of Taylor and colleagues (46), one potential reason why model personalisation may provide benefits over “traditional” machine learning methods is because this allows to deal with heterogeneity, a feature that is characteristic both of depression and the way patients respond to treatment (83, 84).”
  • MDD is poorly defined and diagnosed because its diagnosis is mostly based on data subjectively reported by patients themselves and lacks objective, clinically relevant outcome measures.

    “Despite its medical importance MDD is poorly defined and diagnosed since its diagnosis is mostly based on data subjectively reported by the patients themselves (13–15) and lack of objective, clinically relevant outcome measure.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fried EI. The 52 symptoms of major depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;208:191-197.
  2. Santor DA, Gregus M, Welch A. Eight decades of measurement in depression. Measurement. 2006;4:135-155.
  3. Fried EI, van Borkulo CD, Cramer AOJ, et al. Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;1:1-32. •• This is the first review about the way symptoms of mental disorders (including depression) interact in causal pathways.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fried, E.
Affiliations
Departmenf of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
423-425
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2601225127
Cited by
220
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council Consolidator (647209)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
depression heterogeneity, depression treatment, depression research, clinical care, endophenotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review