Racism in the Structure of Everyday Worlds: A Cultural-Psychological Perspective
Abstract
Theory and research in cultural psychology highlight the need to examine racism not only “in the head” but also “in the world.” Racism is often defined as individual prejudice, but racism is also systemic, existing in the advantages and disadvantages imprinted in cultural artifacts, ideological discourse, and institutional realities that work together with individual biases. In this review, we highlight examples of historically derived ideas and cultural patterns that maintain present-day racial inequalities. We discuss three key insights on the psychology of racism derived from utilizing a cultural-psychology framework. First, one can find racism embedded in our everyday worlds. Second, through our preferences and selections, we maintain racialized contexts in everyday action. Third, we inhabit cultural worlds that, in turn, promote racialized ways of seeing, being in, and acting in the world. This perspective directs attempts at intervention away from individual tendencies and instead focuses on changing the structures of mind in context that reflect and reproduce racial domination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.
“This theoretical perspective conceptually builds upon the epistemologies of ignorance framework,37–40 wherein ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.”
From Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641 · see citing works
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682 · see citing works
Eberhardt, J. L. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.181 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620927709 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Saleem, F. T., Anderson, R. E., & Williams, M. (2020) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-019-00304-1 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Williams, M. T., Reed, S., & Aggarwal, R. (2019) · Journal of Psychedelic Studies · doi:10.1556/2054.2019.016 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“While it is unquestionably important to understand the roots, development, and impact of white individuals’ racial attitudes, doing so has often situated the concept of race, and relatedly racial identity, as something “other” people have (Salter et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAnti-racist actions and accountability: not more empty promises
Boykin, C. M., Brown, N. D., Carter, J. T., Dukes, K., Green, D. J., Harrison, T., Hebl, M., McCleary-Gaddy, A., Membere, A., McJunkins, C. A., et al. (2020) · Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/edi-06-2020-0158 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race
Skinner-Dorkenoo, A. L., Rogbeer, K. G., Sarmal, A., Ware, C., & Zhu, J. (2023) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2023.0036 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“This theoretical perspective conceptually builds upon the epistemologies of ignorance framework, 37–40 wherein ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.”
Background
- Authors
- Salter, P. S., Adams, G., & Perez, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salter, Phia S.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 150-155
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2772894522
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- racism, systemic racism, cultural psychology, racial inequality, everyday life, cultural artifacts, institutional racism, racial domination, structural racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review