Cited by 299Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

Racism in the Structure of Everyday Worlds: A Cultural-Psychological Perspective

Salter, Phia S., Adams, Glenn, Perez, Michael J.·2018·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Theory and research in cultural psychology highlight the need to examine racism not only “in the head” but also “in the world.” Racism is often defined as individual prejudice, but racism is also systemic, existing in the advantages and disadvantages imprinted in cultural artifacts, ideological discourse, and institutional realities that work together with individual biases. In this review, we highlight examples of historically derived ideas and cultural patterns that maintain present-day racial inequalities. We discuss three key insights on the psychology of racism derived from utilizing a cultural-psychology framework. First, one can find racism embedded in our everyday worlds. Second, through our preferences and selections, we maintain racialized contexts in everyday action. Third, we inhabit cultural worlds that, in turn, promote racialized ways of seeing, being in, and acting in the world. This perspective directs attempts at intervention away from individual tendencies and instead focuses on changing the structures of mind in context that reflect and reproduce racial domination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721417724239

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.

    “This theoretical perspective conceptually builds upon the epistemologies of ignorance framework,37–40 wherein ignorance of highly relevant sociohistorical background information is theorized to shape contemporary perceptions of societal issues.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salter, P. S., Adams, G., & Perez, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Salter, Phia S.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2017-12-07
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
150-155
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2772894522
Cited by
299
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
FWCI
27.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
racism, systemic racism, cultural psychology, racial inequality, everyday life, cultural artifacts, institutional racism, racial domination, structural racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review