Cited by 84Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Decision-Making Competence: More Than Intelligence?

Open access
Bruine de Bruin, Wändi, Parker, Andrew M., Fischhoff, Baruch·2020·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Decision-making competence refers to the ability to make better decisions, as defined by decision-making principles posited by models of rational choice. Historically, psychological research on decision-making has examined how well people follow these principles under carefully manipulated experimental conditions. When individual differences received attention, researchers often assumed that individuals with higher fluid intelligence would perform better. Here, we describe the development and validation of individual-differences measures of decision-making competence. Emerging findings suggest that decision-making competence may tap not only into fluid intelligence but also into motivation, emotion regulation, and experience (or crystallized intelligence). Although fluid intelligence tends to decline with age, older adults may be able to maintain decision-making competence by leveraging age-related improvements in these other skills. We discuss implications for interventions and future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721420901592

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the consequences of each alternative are known in advance or can be memorized, a person's ability to make a rational decision taking into account benefits and costs of each option depends more on intelligence and less on executive control functions.

    “Когда последствия выбора каждой альтернативы заранее известны или поддаются запоминанию, способность человека к принятию рационального решения с учетом выгод и издержек каждой опции зависит в большей степени от уровня интеллекта и в меньшей степени -от функций исполнительного контроля (Skagerlund et al., 2022), а также компенсирующих их факторов: опыта, образования, мотивации и навыков эмоциональ”

    From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin et al., 2020

    “More Than Just Intelligence?” (p. 9) reports that decision-making competence correlates with both fluid intelligence and executive functioning. It does not say that intelligence matters more than executive control when alternatives’ consequences are known or can be memorized. Its stronger-correlation finding compares two decision-making tasks, not intelligence with executive control. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Del Missier, F., Hansson, P., Parker, A.M., Bruine de Bruin, W., Nilsson, L.G., & Mäntylä, T (2017). Unraveling the aging skein: Disentangling the effects of sensory and cognitive predictors on decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 123-139 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2020-03-18
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
186-192
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W3009087020
Cited by
78
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (Program on Science and Proven Experience)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
decision-making capacity, individual differences, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, motivation, emotion regulation, rational choice, aging, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review