The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Innovation Imperative: The Relationships Between Team Climate, Innovation, and Performance in Research and Development Teams
Abstract
A team’s climate for innovation has been shown to be important for innovation in management and work teams. This article investigates the relationship of team climate with project team innovation and performance in research and development organizations. It is argued that the relationship between team climate and innovation will be stronger for research teams than development teams as research teams have greater scope for creating novel and innovative ideas. A sample of 193 scientists and technologists in 20 research teams and 18 development teams were measured on their team’s climate for innovation, team performance, and six indicators of innovation. Research and development teams showed similar ratings for team climate and for measures of innovation. However, the relationships between team climate and individual and team innovation were stronger for research teams than development teams. These findings are significant for fostering innovativeness and innovation in knowledge work teams.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical research on leadership and implementation identifies mechanisms through which leaders affect implementation including facilitating positive organizational climate (Aarons, Sommerfeld, & Willging, 2011), supportive team climate (Bain, Mann, & Pirola-Merlo, 2001), and positive work attitudes (Kinjerski & Skrypnek, 2008).”
From The Roles of System and Organizational Leadership in System-Wide Evidence-Based Intervention Sustainment: A Mixed-Method Study (2016) · cites this paper as Bain, Mann, & Pirola-Merlo, 2001
Citations
Cites
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27 · Cited by 1,766
Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies.
Simonton, D. K., West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1992) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393481 · Cited by 1,344
Innovation in top management teams.
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680 · Cited by 1,148
R&D WORK CLIMATE AND INNOVATION IN SEMICONDUCTORS.
Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. W. (1983) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255984 · Cited by 401
Creativity in the R&D Laboratory
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. (1987) · doi:10.35613/ccl.1987.1088 · Cited by 295
Individual, Climate, and Group Interaction Processes as Predictors of Work Team Innovation
Burningham, C., & West, M. A. (1995) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496495261006 · Cited by 235
Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1994) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00557.x · Cited by 151
Innovation, cultural values, and the management of change in British hospitals
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1992) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678379208259959 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Dunning, J., 1st International Work Psychology Conference
- Ekvall, G., 1983, Creative organizational climate: Construction and validation of a measuring instrument
- Pirola-Merlo, A. J. (2000). Innovation in R&D project teams: Modelling the effects of individual, team and organisational factors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. H., & Strange, J. M. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00158-3 · Cited by 1,749
Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00050-x · Cited by 1,619
Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x · Cited by 1,276
Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 · Cited by 1,173
Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles.
Eisenbeiß, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012716 · Cited by 742
Metadata
- Authors
- Bain, P. G., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Melbourne
- Corresponding author
- Mann, Leon
- Venue
- Small Group Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-73
- ISSN
- 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8278
- OpenAlex
- W1974062135
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 13.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Small Group Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
- Keywords
- team climate, innovation climate, team performance, research groups, development teams, R&D organization, innovation indicators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review