The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research
Abstract
In this article, the authors present an empirical example of triangulation in qualitative health research. The Canadian Heart Health Dissemination Project (CHHDP) involves a national examination of capacity building and dissemination undertaken within a series of provincial dissemination projects. The Project's focus is on the context, processes, and impacts of health promotion capacity building and dissemination. The authors collected qualitative data within a parallel–case study design using key informant interviews as well as document analysis. Given the range of qualitative data sets used, it is essential to triangulate the data to address completeness, convergence, and dissonance of key themes. Although one finds no shortage of admonitions in the literature that it must be done, there is little guidance with respect to operationalizing a triangulation process. Consequently, the authors are feeling their way through the process, using this opportunity to develop, implement, and reflect on a triangulation protocol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742
Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research
Paterson, B., Thorne, S., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781412985017 · Cited by 664
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1177/0192512199204006 · DOI
- 10.1108/00251740110391448 · doi:10.1108/00251740110391448
- 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00371.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.15217.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00145701 · DOI · Paper page
- Creswell, J. W., 2003, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
- 10.1111/1467-9256.00138 · doi:10.1111/1467-9256.00138
- 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00102-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Denzin, N. K., 1978, The research act: Atheoretical introduction to sociological methods
- 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010183.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1090198103030003003 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1004249313062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781412984775 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0539018402041001001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00036-7 · DOI
- 10.1191/1463423603pc173oa · doi:10.1191/1463423603pc173oa
- 10.4135/9781483349015.n26 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026447822732 · doi:10.1023/a:1026447822732
- 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.210 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1014984232147 · DOI · Paper page
- Miles, M. B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis
- Morse, J. M., 1994, Critical issues in qualitative research methods, 1
- Murray, J. S., 1999, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 16, 194
- 10.1177/1090198103255521 · doi:10.1177/1090198103255521
- National Institutes of Health, 1999, Qualitative methods in health research: Opportunities and considerations in application and review
- Patton, M. Q., 2002, Qualitative research and evaluation methods
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00269.x · DOI
- Sharp, H. O., 1943, Photogrammetry
- 10.1093/bjsw/31.6.863 · doi:10.1093/bjsw/31.6.863
- 10.1016/S0020-7489(98)00014-5 · DOI
- Smaling, A., 1987, Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek [Methodological objectivity and qualitative research]
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00035-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00221-4 · DOI
- Weiss, C. H., 1998, Evaluation
- 10.1111/1467-8306.9302011 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587 · Cited by 1,584
Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness
Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x · Cited by 1,318
Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists
Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x · Cited by 503
Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042 · Cited by 419
Investigator Triangulation: A Collaborative Strategy With Potential for Mixed Methods Research
Archibald, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689815570092 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Farmer, T., Robinson, K., Elliott, S. J., & Eyles, J.
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-394
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2101288585
- Cited by
- 997
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 52.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1049732305285708
- The paper
- Farmer, T., Robinson, K., Elliott, S. J., & Eyles, J. (2006). Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.