Cited by 24Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The Unifying Difference: Dyadic Coping With Spontaneous Abortion Among Religious Jewish Couples

Hamama-Raz, Yaira, Hemmendinger, Shirley, Buchbinder, Eli·2010·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

In this study we examined the meaning of abortion in the religious Jewish sector on both the individual and the couple levels. In a qualitative, descriptive, interpretive-narrative study, semistructured interviews were conducted with five religious couples. Both members of each couple were interviewed separately. The findings show that although both members of the couple experienced spontaneous abortion as a loss, each expressed it in different ways and thus perceived it differently in the couple relationship. Men who demonstrated the ability to bypass their own pain and made an effort to respond to their partners’ distress motivated the women’s exit from the isolation cycle, and contributed to a sense of dyadic cohesion and to creating a meaning for their “togetherness.” These findings are discussed in the context of research and theoretical literature that deal with bereavement and mourning processes, and with constructing meaning for a pregnancy-related loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732309357054

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A smaller number of studies have suggested potential benefits of this role, particularly among people who are instrumental grievers, for whom this role could provide purpose.

    “However, a smaller number of studies have also suggested potential benefits of this role, particularly among people who are instrumental grievers, for whom this role could provide purpose [30, 41].”
  • Participants in three studies reported a struggle in recognising their transition into fatherhood and questioned if they had the right to the 'father' title following a loss.

    “participants in three studies reported a struggle in recognising their transition into fatherhood, and questioned if they had the right to the ‘father’ title following a loss [41, 43, 46].”
  • The existing body of research indicates that pregnancy loss may lead to a loss of identity related to both the anticipated father role, and the grief and loss associated with changes after a pregnancy loss.

    “the existing body of research indicates that pregnancy loss may lead to a loss of identity related to both the anticipated father role, and the grief and loss associated with the changes which may come after a pregnancy loss [41, 43, 46].”
  • Qualitative studies were generally of a high standard, with methodologies and analyses clearly reported and justified in the context of exploratory or understanding lived experience research aims.

    “Qualitative studies were generally of a high standard, with methodologies and analyses (content [46, 55, 60, 64, 69], thematic [61, 65, 71, 72], grounded theory [59, 62, 68], autoethnographic [66], descriptive [83] and phenomenological [56–58, 73–75, 77–82]) clearly reported and justified in the context of ‘exploratory’ or ‘understanding lived experience’ research aims.”
  • Other men in 10 studies reported less intense reactions, including stating that their partners experienced worse grief in comparison to them.

    “However, other men in 10 studies (some overlapping with the above 14 studies) also reported less intense reactions, including stating that their partners experienced worse grief in comparison to them [56, 61, 69, 71–75, 78, 79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamama-Raz, Y., Hemmendinger, S., & Buchbinder, E.
Affiliations
  • Arial University Center of Samaria, Ariel, Israel,
  • Ariel University (IL)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
251-261
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2155153561
Cited by
24
References
47
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
miscarriage, dyadic coping, grief, bereavement, mourning, couple relationships, meaning-making, dyadic cohesion
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Judaism, Male, Pregnancy, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review