The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Devil's Advocate: A Strategy to Avoid Groupthink and Stimulate Discussion in Focus Groups
Abstract
The focus group is an increasingly popular qualitative research method in health research to gain insight into complex problems. Concerns have been expressed about how best to stimulate free and open discussion; especially on controversial issues and/or when the group comprises people with different power and status. A potential pitfall of the focus group technique is group-think: the impact of censoring and conforming as described by such social psychologists as Irving Janis. The article describes an evaluation of a method to reduce groupthink and stimulate creativity and controversy in focus groups that analyzed consultation between an Australian federal government department and its communities. The article recommends to researchers using focus groups the selective use of devil's advocates to reflect different perspectives to groups, to ask questions in a different way, to introduce new questions, and to avoid groups arriving at premature solutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MacDougall's experiment confirmed that the operation of the devil's advocacy opened up new alternatives.
“The experiment confirmed that the operation of the devil's advocacy opened up new alternatives but it was unclear whether the final decision quality was improved or not.”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The devil's advocates take the opposite position against alternative solutions presented by other group members.
“A devil's advocate takes an opposite position against alternative solutions that presented by fellow ingroup members [28, 29].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Some studies recommended the devil's advocacy to prevent groupthink.
“Some studies recommended the devil's advocacy to prevent groupthink [28, 29, 47].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The opposition by devil's advocates triggers other group members to reflect on issues from different perspectives and to avoid premature solutions.
“This opposition triggers the other group members to reflect on the issues from different perspectives and to avoid the premature solutions [29].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Adding more devil's advocates increases the number of explored solutions during group decision making.
“simulation results show that adding more devil's advocates increases the number of explored solutions during the group decision making.”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The formulation of devil's advocate behavior as the agent's opposition against ingroup members' solutions instead of adopting them is consistent with the devil's advocacy role in which an opposite position is formed against alternatives presented by other ingroup members.
“the formulation of the devil's advocate behavior is formulated as the agent's opposition against ingroup members' solutions instead of adopting them. This mechanism is consistent with the devil's advocacy role in which an opposite position is formed against alternatives presented by the other ingroup members [28, 29].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
It was unclear whether the final decision quality was improved by the devil's advocacy in MacDougall's experiment.
“The experiment confirmed that the operation of the devil's advocacy opened up new alternatives but it was unclear whether the final decision quality was improved or not.”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The first author served as the devil's advocate to challenge assumptions made and present alternative interpretations or coding of the data.
“Following recommendations by MacDougall and Baum [51], the first author served as the devil’s advocate to challenge assumptions made and present alternative interpretations or coding of the data.”
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. J. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
McQuarrie, E. F., & Krueger, R. A. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172912 · Cited by 15,489
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
(1990) · Cited by 8,425
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Londoño Fernández, J. L. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80230-0 · Cited by 5,754
(1982) · Houghton Mifflin eBooks · Cited by 2,650
Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art
Morgan, D. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483349008 · Cited by 1,586
Lorentzon, M. (1993) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.180610057.x · Cited by 1,386
Merton, R. Κ., & Kendall, P. L. (1946) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/219886 · Cited by 1,212
When to Use Focus Groups and Why
Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483349008.n1 · Cited by 1,177
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
(2019) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/(issn)2201-1617 · Cited by 566
Focus Groups in Health Research
Wilkinson, S. (1998) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910539800300304 · Cited by 503
The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities
Merton, R. Κ. (1987) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269057 · Cited by 497
Capturing the Group Effect in Focus Groups: A Special Concern in Analysis
Carey, M. A., & Smith, M. W. (1994) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239400400108 · Cited by 381
Conducting Focus Group Sessions
Folch-Lyon, E., & Trost, J. F. (1981) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.2307/1965656 · Cited by 262
Focus groups in tropical diseases research
Khan, M. E., & Manderson, L. H. (1992) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/7.1.56 · Cited by 174
Hawe, P., Hall, J. P., & Degeling, D. (1990) · Cited by 146
Review of Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed.
Weick, K. E. (1984) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/022593 · Cited by 116
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 1993, The new shorter Oxford English dictionary
- 1991, The Oxford encyclopedic dictionary
- 1975, The Random House college dictionary
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Part II. Rigour in qualitative research: complexities and solutions
Tuckett, A. G. (2005) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2005.07.13.1.29.c5998 · Cited by 260
Toward rigorous use of expert knowledge in ecological research
Drescher, M., Perera, A., Johnson, C. J., Buse, L. J., Drew, C., & Burgman, M. (2013) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es12-00415.1 · Cited by 190
Cognitive Biases in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study
Mohanani, R., Salman, I., Turhan, B., Rodríguez, P., & Ralph, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2018.2877759 · Cited by 185
McAvoy, J., & Butler, T. (2009) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.22 · Cited by 136
A qualitative study of action plans for asthma
Douglass, J. A., Aroni, R., Goeman, D., Stewart, K., Sawyer, S., Thien, F. C. K., & Abramson, M. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7344.1003 · Cited by 122
Kitzinger, J. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470750841.ch3 · Cited by 140
The Nominal Group Technique: an aid to Brainstorming ideas in research
Boddy, C. R. (2011) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522751211191964 · Cited by 118
Deflating the Dream: Radical Risk and the Neoliberalization of Homeownership
Saegert, S., Fields, D., & Libman, K. (2009) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00461.x · Cited by 100
Pierik, M. E., Dell’Acqua, M., Confalonieri, R., Bocchi, S., & Gomarasca, S. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.032 · Cited by 102
Resilience in Family Businesses: A Systematic Literature Review
Yilmaz, Y., Raetze, S., de Groote, J. D., & Kammerlander, N. H. (2024) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/08944865231223372 · Cited by 88
Kosteli, M., Williams, S. E., & Cumming, J. (2016) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2016.1143943 · Cited by 82
Libman, K. (2007) · Applied Environmental Education & Communication · doi:10.1080/15330150701319388 · Cited by 84
Wutich, A., Lant, T., White, D. D., Larson, K. L., & Gartin, M. (2009) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x09349918 · Cited by 69
Qualitative Methods in Health Economics
Coast, J., & Allegri, M. D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.93 · Cited by 67
MacDougall, C., Schiller, W., & Darbyshire, P. (2004) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/0300443032000153426 · Cited by 62
Self-citationDairy farmers' expectations and receptivity regarding animal welfare advice: A focus group study
Croyle, S., Belage, E., Khosa, D. K., LeBlanc, S. J., Haley, D. B., & Kelton, D. F. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15821 · Cited by 59
Beyond projection: using collaborative visualization to conduct qualitative interviews
Comi, A., Bischof, N., & Eppler, M. J. (2014) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qrom-05-2012-1074 · Cited by 58
Teaching Focus Group Interviewing
George, M. (2012) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.1177/0092055x12465295 · Cited by 59
‘You are not born being racist, are you?’ Discussing racism with primary aged-children
Priest, N., Walton, J., White, F. A., Kowal, E., Fox, B., & Paradies, Y. (2014) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2014.946496 · Cited by 60
Using focus groups to evaluate health promotion interventions
Mitchell, K., & Branigan, P. (2000) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/09654280010354887 · Cited by 50
Véliz, K. D., Walters, J. P., Busco, C., & Vargas, M. (2023) · Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances · doi:10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200145 · Cited by 39
Situational Factors in Focus Group Studies: A Systematic Review
Orvik, A., Larun, L., Berland, A. K., & Ringsberg, K. C. (2013) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940691301200116 · Cited by 38
Mariscal, E. S., Akin, B. A., Lieberman, A. A., & Washington, D. (2015) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.017 · Cited by 34
Pollock, K. E., & Winton, S. (2015) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9224-7 · Cited by 32
Challenges on the interaction of models and policy for pandemic control
Hadley, L., Challenor, P., Dent, C. J., Isham, V. S., Mollison, D., Robertson, D. A., Swallow, B., & Webb, C. R. (2021) · Epidemics · doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100499 · Cited by 30
Werner, S., & Chabany, R. (2015) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/ort0000125 · Cited by 29
How Do You Build Community and Foster Engagement in Online Courses?
Dolan, J., Kain, K. M., Reilly, J., & Bansal, G. (2017) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.20248 · Cited by 30
Stohr, M. K., Makin, D. A., Stanton, D. L., Hemmens, C. T., Willits, D. W., Lovrich, N. P., Meize, M. R., Snyder, J., Lu, R., & Wu, G. (2020) · Justice Evaluation Journal · doi:10.1080/24751979.2020.1756378 · Cited by 28
Collecting qualitative data: Part I Journal as a method: experience, rationale and limitations
Tuckett, A. G., & Stewart, D. E. (2004) · Contemporary Nurse · doi:10.5172/conu.16.1-2.104 · Cited by 28
McGill, B., O'Hara, B. J., Grunseit, A. C., Bauman, A. E., Osborne, D., Lawler, L., & Phongsavan, P. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5136-z · Cited by 27
Jack, S. M., Sheehan, D., González, A., MacMillan, H. L., Catherine, N. L. A., & Waddell, C. (2015) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-015-0097-3 · Cited by 25
Garcia, C. A., & Lane, J. (2012) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.02.005 · Cited by 23
Johnson, C. J., Hurley, M., Rapaport, E., & Pullinger, M. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1034-8_8 · Cited by 23
Probation officer discretion in monitoring and violating supervision conditions
Ruhland, E. L., & Scheibler, E. (2021) · Probation Journal · doi:10.1177/02645505211041578 · Cited by 22
Keng, S.-L., Mohd Salleh Sahimi, H. B., Chan, L. F., Woon, L., Eu, C. L., Sim, S. H., & Wong, M. K. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03500-y · Cited by 20
Looking in the Rearview Mirror: What Incarcerated Women Think Girls Need From The System
Garcia, C. A., & Lane, J. (2010) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/1557085110376341 · Cited by 20
Amplifying Minority Voices: AI-Mediated Devil's Advocate System for Inclusive Group Decision-Making
Lee, S., Kim, M., Hwang, S., Kim, D.-J., & Lee, K. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3708557.3716334 · Cited by 19
Bellairs-Walsh, I., Byrne, S. J., Bendall, S., Perry, Y., Krysinska, K. E., Lin, A. P., Michail, M., Lamblin, M., Li, T. Y., Hetrick, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182412926 · Cited by 19
Is society caught up in a Death Spiral? Modeling societal demise and its reversal
Schippers, M. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Luijks, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1194597 · Cited by 26
Lee, S., Hwang, S., Kim, D.-J., & Lee, K. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719792 · Cited by 30
Reactive Devaluation as a Psychological Impediment to Construction Dispute Negotiation
Cheung, S. O., Li, K., & Chow, O. Y. (2020) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000787 · Cited by 18
Akhmad, M., Chang, S., & Deguchi, H. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00083-8 · Cited by 18
Opstal, W. V., & Smeets, A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142013069 · Cited by 17
Promoção de qualidade de vida em crianças e adolescentes
Gaspar, T., Ribeiro, J. L. P., de Matos, M. G., & Leal, I. M. P. (2008) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 17
On food security and access to fish in the Saugeen Ojibway Nation, Lake Huron, Canada
Lowitt, K. N., Johnston-Weiser, D., Lauzon, R., & Hickey, G. M. (2017) · Journal of Great Lakes Research · doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2017.10.009 · Cited by 17
Cook, L. L. (2019) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/1473325019865014 · Cited by 17
‘I’m not sick!…Are you?’ Groupthink in police services as a barrier to collecting mental health data
Ricciardelli, R., Czarnuch, S. M., Kuzmochka, N., & Martin, K. (2021) · International Journal of Police Science & Management · doi:10.1177/14613557211008473 · Cited by 16
Tracy, S. (2005) · Australian Midwifery · doi:10.1016/s1448-8272(05)80026-4 · Cited by 16
Military Nursing Care of Iraqi Patients
Goodman, P., Edge, B., Agazio, J. B. G., & Prue-Owens, K. (2013) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-13-00055 · Cited by 15
Encountering the ‘Other’: Interpreting Student Experiences of a Multi-Sensory Museum Exhibition
Schorch, P., Walton, J., Priest, N., & Paradies, Y. (2015) · Journal of Intercultural Studies · doi:10.1080/07256868.2015.1008432 · Cited by 15
Akesson, B. (2015) · Global Studies of Childhood · doi:10.1177/2043610615573378 · Cited by 13
Improving Environmental Indicators through Involvement of Experts, Stakeholders, and the Public
Morrone, M., & Hawley, M. (1998) · The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) · Cited by 12
Shealy, T., Klotz, L., Weber, E. U., Johnson, E. J., & Bell, R. G. (2019) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000692 · Cited by 11
MacGabhann, L., McGowan, P., Walsh, J., & O’Reilly, O. (2010) · The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services · doi:10.5042/ijlps.2010.0572 · Cited by 10
A Cooperative Inquiry Into Action Learning and Praxis Development in a Community Nursing Module
Jenkins, E. R., Mabbett, G. M., Surridge, A. G., Warring, J., & Gwynn, E. D. (2009) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732309344110 · Cited by 10
Russo, A., Lewis, B., Ali, R., Abed, A., Russell, G. M., & Luchters, S. M. F. (2022) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-022-02296-6 · Cited by 9
Okoko, J. M. (2023) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_31 · Cited by 9
Lewandowski, C., Carter, J. G., & Campbell, W. L. (2016) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2016.1250631 · Cited by 9
TheDSMRevision as a Social Psychological Process: A Commentary on Blashfield and Reynolds
Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., & Smith, S. F. (2012) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.6.830 · Cited by 9
Leyland, C., Greer, T., & Rettig-Miki, E. (2016) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2015.1100129 · Cited by 8
Lacy, D., & Catherine, J. (2009) · QUT Business School · Cited by 8
Happiness in the workplace: an appreciative inquiry
McGonagle, C. (2015) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · Cited by 8
King, N., Vriezen, R., Edge, V. L., Ford, J. D., Wood, M., Government, R. I. C., & Harper, S. L. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196990 · Cited by 7
Parvanta, C. F., Hammond, R. W., He, W., Zemen, R., Boddupalli, S., Walker, K. K., Chen, H., & Harner, R. N. (2022) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2022.2100016 · Cited by 7
Godart, F. C., Cavarretta, F., & Thiemann, M. (2016) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtv046 · Cited by 7
When Leaders are in the Numerical Majority or Minority: Differential Effects on Problem‐Solving
Martin, R., Thomas, G., Hewstone, M., & Gardikiotis, A. (2018) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12258 · Cited by 6
Bruen, J., Kelly, N., & Loftus, M. (2019) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1636212 · Cited by 6
Teaching strategies to facilitate social and cognitive processes in online learning environments
van Dorresteijn, C., Meij, M., Roblin, N. P., Cornelissen, F., Voogt, J. M., & Volman, M. L. L. (2024) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2024.2379790 · Cited by 9
Kylmä, J., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. M., & Lähdevirta, J. (2001) · Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care · doi:10.1016/s1055-3290(06)60136-2 · Cited by 5
Leading Change and the Challenges of Managing a Learning Organisation in Hong Kong
Chow, A. S. (2014) · Journal of Management Research · doi:10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5147 · Cited by 5
A Content Analysis of the Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport: 1992-2016
Miller, J. J., Gillentine, A., Olinger, A., & Vogt, S. (2018) · Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport · doi:10.18060/22898 · Cited by 5
Mapping Team Dynamics Through Retrospective Team Events Analysis
van Dun, D. H., Wijnmaalen, J., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069221120745 · Cited by 5
Samuel, J. D., Farr, R. H., Werner‐Wilson, R. J., & Fey, M. D. (2024) · Adoption Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10926755.2024.2369981 · Cited by 4
Seeing the bigger picture: Qualitative research in the Zoom ® age
Fletcher, S. J. (2021) · The Journal of Haemophilia Practice · doi:10.2478/jhp-2021-0019 · Cited by 4
Golob, B. (2021) · International Journal of Public Legal Education · doi:10.19164/ijple.v5i1.1116 · Cited by 4
Cognitive Biases in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping and Quasi-Literature Review
Mohanani, R., Salman, I., Turhan, B., Rodríguez, P., & Ralph, P. (2017) · Cited by 4
An Overall Health and Well-Being Data Model for Employer-Sponsored Personal Health Records
Fernando, M., Fidge, C., & Sahama, T. R. (2019) · Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (ACSW) · doi:10.1145/3290688.3290727 · Cited by 4
Promoção do bem-estar na adolescência: Impacto do estatuto socio- económico e do estatuto migrante
Gaspar, T. (2012) · Análise Psicológica · doi:10.14417/ap.493 · Cited by 4
How do you build community and foster engagement in online courses?
Dolan, J., Kain, K. M., Reilly, J., & Bansal, G. (2022) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.20510 · Cited by 3
Revisiting Perfectionism in High-Level Ballet: A Longitudinal Collective Instrumental Case Study
Nordin‐Bates, S. M., Aldoson, M., & Downing, C. (2023) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.2022-0054 · Cited by 5
An information-based approach to organizational change management
Freeburg, D. (2020) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-06-2019-0097 · Cited by 3
Exploring Intentions and Outcomes in a Contemplative Classroom: A Qualitative Study
Godlaski, A. J. (2018) · Scholarship & Creative Works - Digital UNC a service of University Libraries (University of Northern Colorado) · Cited by 3
Lewis, V. J., Dess, G. G., Yawson, R. M., & Ghani, U. A. (2025) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1108/omj-05-2025-978 · Cited by 3
Rodgers, A. J. (2025) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2025.2599703 · Cited by 2
Help or Hindrance? Examining the role of generative AI in shaping students' entrepreneurial mindsets
Ma, C., 重和, 樋., Chen, S.-H., & Liu, W. (2026) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101483 · Cited by 2
Desvantagem socio-económica, etnicidade e consumo de álcool na adolescência
Gaspar, T., Gonçalves, A. C., Ramos, V., & de Matos, M. G. (2012) · Análise Psicológica · doi:10.14417/ap.545 · Cited by 2
Boyz 2 Men: Responsible Empowerment for Inner-City Adolescent Males.
Gilgoff, J. N. (2007) · Afterschool Matters · Cited by 2
Special Forms of Bias: Endowment Effect and Reactive Devaluation
Cheung, S. O., & Li, K. (2021) · Springer tracts in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80256-1_4 · Cited by 2
Choi, J. J., Rosen, M. A., Shapiro, M. F., & Safford, M. M. (2023) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2023-0065 · Cited by 2
Baker, D. S. (2018) · NORMA · Cited by 2
Biases and debiasing in human and artificial intelligence
Catellani, P., & Piastra, M. (2025) · Oñati Socio-legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.2304 · Cited by 1
Barriers, solutions and benefits of sharing electric vehicle charging infrastructure
Govik, L., & Wallström, H. (2025) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103871 · Cited by 1
Elkins, J. S., Dale, I., Okumu, E., Zinck, M., Golin, C. E., McCrimmon, J., Esposito, M., Duguid, I., Craven, D. M., Onyeama, U. F., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1695474 · Cited by 1
Mann, A. (2025) · Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_50_25 · Cited by 1
Meyer, R. (2026) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia7020075 · Cited by 1
The Hearing is Just a Formality: You’re Never Getting Out
Ruhland, E. L., & Laskorunsky, J. A. (2023) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287231180097 · Cited by 1
Rodgers, A. J. (2023) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2023.112046 · Cited by 1
The Cassandra Method: Dystopian Visions as a Basis for Responsible Design
Diefenbach, S., & Ullrich, D. (2024) · doi:10.3390/engproc2024068002 · Cited by 1
Pharmacy leadership: Balancing the roles of colleague and manager
Myhre, L. J., Oetjen, L., Finnes, H. D., & Cunningham, J. L. (2025) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxaf076 · Cited by 1
Behavioral sciences and public governance: the strategic dissident effect
dos Santos, E. C. R., dos Prazeres, R. V., da Silva, W. V., Filho, R. N. L., & dos Anjos, L. C. M. (2025) · Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia · doi:10.5585/2025.26573 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDougall, C., & Baum, F.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Department of Public Health at Flinders University of South Australia, South Australian Community Health Research Unit
- Corresponding author
- MacDougall, Colin
- ORCID
- MacDougall, Colin
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-541
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2132549529
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- devil's advocate, groupthink, focus groups, group discussion, controversial issues, conformity, creativity, health research methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review