CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 249Environmental Sustainability in BusinessCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making Green Stuff? Effects of Corporate Greenwashing on Consumers

Open access
De Jong, Menno D. T., Harkink, Karen M., Barth, Susanne·2018·Journal of Business and Technical Communication
DOI 10.1177/1050651917729863PMC PMC6044111
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The marketing success of green products has spawned the phenomenon of greenwashing, but studies on the effects of greenwashing on consumers are still limited. Using a 4 × 2 randomized experimental design, this study examines such effects by determining whether consumers respond differently to greenwashing, silent brown, vocal green, and silent green organizations selling hedonic products (perfume) or utilitarian products (detergent). The results show that consumers recognized the green claims in the greenwashing condition, which led to an environmental performance impression in between green and brown organizations but also to more negative judgments about the integrity of communication. Regarding purchase interest, greenwashing organizations performed similarly as silent brown organizations, with significantly lower scores than those of vocal green and silent green organizations. No significant effects of product type and no interaction effects were found. Overall, greenwashing has only limited benefits (perceived environmental performance), poses a major threat (perceived integrity), and has no true competitive advantage (purchase interest).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1050651917729863

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Typology of environmental strategies (Delmas & Burbano, 2011).
Figure 1. Typology of environmental strategies (Delmas & Burbano, 2011).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Possible mechanism for the lack of effect of greenwashed communication on consumer purchase interest: weaker effects on perceptions of environmental performance.
Figure 2. Possible mechanism for the lack of effect of greenwashed communication on consumer purchase interest: weaker effects on perceptions of environmental performance.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Possible mechanism for the lack of effect of greenwashed communication on consumer purchase interest: moderating role of organizational credibility.
Figure 3. Possible mechanism for the lack of effect of greenwashed communication on consumer purchase interest: moderating role of organizational credibility.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Image 4
CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Image 5
CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Image 6
CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alves I. M., 2009, Journal of Global Change and Governance, 2, 1
  2. Elving W., 2011, Akademija MM (Slovenian Journal of Marketing), 10, 49
  3. 10.1017/S183336720000290X · DOI
  4. TerraChoice. (2010). The sins of greenwashing. Home and family edition 2010: Report on environmental claims made in the North American consumer market. Retrieved from http://sinsofgreenwashing.com/index35c6.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–244 of 244

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
De Jong, M. D. T., Harkink, K. M., & Barth, S.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
De Jong, Menno D. T.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2017-09-25
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
77-112
ISSN
  • 0892-5720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-6519
  • 1552-4574
DOI
10.1177/1050651917729863
PMC
PMC6044111
OpenAlex
W2757956424
Cited by
249
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
14.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Business and Technical Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
greenwashing, corporate greenwashing, consumer response, environmental claims, purchase interest, hedonic products, utilitarian products, green marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review