CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 509Organizational Change and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Management and Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cynicism about Organizational Change: Measurement, Antecedents, and Correlates

Wanous, John P., Reichers, Arnon E., Austin, James T.·2000·Group & Organization Management
DOI 10.1177/1059601100252003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A new construct called Cynicism About Organizational Change (CAOC) was proposed and distinguished from related concepts. The measure of CAOC was supported by confirmatory factor analysis and has acceptable internal consistency reliability. Potential antecedents (measured 21 months before the measurement of CAOC) were examined. Little support was found for CAOC having dispositional roots in one’s general negative affectivity. More support was found for CAOC being learned as a result of little previous change, ineffective leadership practices, and lack of participation in decisions. CAOC was negatively correlated with a concurrent measure of organizational change and with the motivation to keep on trying to support change efforts. In addition, CAOC was negatively correlated with factors outside the realm of change: organizational commitment and the number of labor grievances. Finally, CAOC weakened the instrumentality perception of the relationship between performing well and earning more money, while holding the actual pay system constant.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1059601100252003

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.2307/258717 · DOI
  2. Browne, M. W., 1994, SYSTAT for DOS: Advanced applications, 167
  3. Mann, F. C., 1957, Research in industrial human relation, 146
  4. Pope, K. S., 1993, The MMPI, MMPI-2 & MMPI-A in court
  5. Shapiro, B., 1997, APA Monitor, 34
  6. Steiger, J. H., annual meeting of the Psychometric Society
  7. Tjosvold, D. W., 1991, Leading the team organization

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 509

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Fisher College (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Group & Organization Management
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-06
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
132-153
ISSN
  • 1059-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3993
DOI
10.1177/1059601100252003
OpenAlex
W2130033479
Cited by
509
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Group & Organization Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
Keywords
organizational change, negative affectivity, ineffective leadership, employee participation in decision-making, organizational commitment, labor grievances, wage systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review