The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Understanding Remote Workers’ Management of Work–Family Boundaries: The Complexity of Workplace Embeddedness
Abstract
This study employs a multi-method research design to examine how remote workers, or employees who work solely from home, manage the work–family interface. Our qualitative study revealed that working from home creates unique challenges for remote workers because the work role becomes embedded in the family domain such that their home comes to be associated with the work role, work physically and psychologically intrudes upon their family, and habits and norms form that induce remote workers to be preoccupied with work when home. Based on the qualitative findings, a model was proposed and tested via a questionnaire. Findings from this study of remote workers demonstrated that work–family integration increases family-to-work conflict and work-to-family conflict, and that an inability to disengage from work increases work-to-family conflict. Furthermore, strong work–family integration was found to be particularly harmful to male remote workers’ work-to-family conflict whereas a strong inability to disengage from work was found to be particularly harmful to female remote workers’ work-to-family conflict. Our findings therefore revealed that working solely from home encourages remote workers to overwork and to allow their work to infringe on their family role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“…methods are attracting greater attention because of the realization that qualitative research helps to better understand a phenomenon and produces insight, whereas quantitative research tests quantifiable relationships and helps to determine prevalence and generalizability (Jick, 1979; Lee, 1999).”
BackgroundDevelopment and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400 · Cited by 3,864
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204 · Cited by 2,133
Sonnentag, S. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 · Cited by 1,851
Cited by
Construction and initial validation of the E-Work Life Scale to measure remote e-working
Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., Spurgeon, P. C., Tramontano, C., & Charalampous, M. (2019) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-09-2017-0229 · Cited by 227
Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., & Santos, A. (2023) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2022.2063064 · Cited by 70
Neurodiversity and remote work in times of crisis: lessons for HR
Szulc, J. M., McGregor, F.-L., & Cakir, E. (2023) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-06-2021-0469 · Cited by 63
Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress
Perry, S. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wan, M., & Thompson, M. J. (2023) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09842-y · Cited by 54
Haun, V. C., Remmel, C., & Haun, S. (2022) · German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/23970022221079048 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Eddleston, K. A., & Mulki, J.
- Venue
- Group & Organization Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-12-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-387
- ISSN
- 1059-6011 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3993
- OpenAlex
- W2312485231
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
