Cited by 91Environmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Corporate Environmental Strategy and Voluntary Environmental Behavior—Mediating Effect of Psychological Green Climate

Open access
Das, Anupam Kumar, Biswas, Shetu Ranjan, Abdul Kader Jilani, Munshi Muhammad, Uddin, Md. Aftab·2019·Sustainability

Abstract

Given the growing intent to prevent decay in environmental management, the present study seeks to unearth the impact of corporate environmental strategy on employees’ voluntary environmental behavior by regulating or facilitating their perceived psychological green climate. Research problems and research questions are built on the essence of multiple theories—goal-setting theory, social identity theory, and social learning theory for grounding the research model. A total of 294 replies were collected through a self-administered survey from diverse industrial panoramas. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) analytics via AMOS-version 20.0 for measuring the hypothesized results. The study revealed that the corporate environmental strategy is displaying an insignificant direct influence on voluntary environmental behavior. However, the corporate environmental strategy indirectly influences, via the mediation effect, voluntary environmental behavior of employees through their psychological green climate perception. Directions for future research are recommended based on insights from the implications and limitations of the study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11113123

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no issue of response bias observed in this study.

    “Thus, there is no issue response bias observed in this study [93,94].”

    From A Study of the Adoption and Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Identification of Moderators and Mediator (2020) · cites this paper as [93]

    Section 5.3 (Response Bias; page unavailable) reports precautions and diagnostic checks in the cited paper’s own study, including a one-factor test in which no factor explained more than 50% of the variance. That supports a limited conclusion about bias in that study, but it cannot establish that no response bias was observed in the citing authors’ study. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rousseau, D.M. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Res. Organ. Behav. 1985, 7, 1-37.
  2. Howladar, M.H.R.; Rahman, M.S.; Uddin, M.A. Deviant Workplace Behavior and Job Performance: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. Iran. J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 11, 147-183. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1977.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, A. K., Biswas, S. R., Abdul Kader Jilani, M. M., & Uddin, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • University of Chittagong (BD)
  • School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Corresponding author
  • Biswas, Shetu Ranjan
  • Uddin, Md. Aftab
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
3123
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948098101
Cited by
91
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
corporate environmental strategy, employee environmental behavior, mediating effect, goal setting theory, social identity theory, social learning theory, environmental management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review