Cited by 22Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Unveiling Molecular Events in the Brain by Noninvasive Imaging

Klohs, Jan, Rudin, Markus·2011·The Neuroscientist

Abstract

Neuroimaging allows researchers and clinicians to noninvasively assess structure and function of the brain. With the advances of imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance, nuclear, and optical imaging; the design of target-specific probes; and/or the introduction of reporter gene assays, these technologies are now capable of visualizing cellular and molecular processes in vivo. Undoubtedly, the system biological character of molecular neuroimaging, which allows for the study of molecular events in the intact organism, will enhance our understanding of physiology and pathophysiology of the brain and improve our ability to diagnose and treat diseases more specifically. Technical/scientific challenges to be faced are the development of highly sensitive imaging modalities, the design of specific imaging probe molecules capable of penetrating the CNS and reporting on endogenous cellular and molecular processes, and the development of tools for extracting quantitative, biologically relevant information from imaging data. Today, molecular neuroimaging is still an experimental approach with limited clinical impact; this is expected to change within the next decade. This article provides an overview of molecular neuroimaging approaches with a focus on rodent studies documenting the exploratory state of the field. Concepts are illustrated by discussing applications related to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073858410383433

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klohs, J., & Rudin, M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Rudin, Markus
Venue
The Neuroscientist
Published
2011-10
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
539-559
ISSN
  • 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4098
OpenAlex
W2170920655
Cited by
22
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
molecular neuroimaging, non-invasive brain imaging, imaging agents, reporter gene assay, magnetic resonance imaging, scintigraphy, optical imaging, brain pathophysiology, Alzheimer's disease, rodent models, CNS penetration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review