Unveiling Molecular Events in the Brain by Noninvasive Imaging
Abstract
Neuroimaging allows researchers and clinicians to noninvasively assess structure and function of the brain. With the advances of imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance, nuclear, and optical imaging; the design of target-specific probes; and/or the introduction of reporter gene assays, these technologies are now capable of visualizing cellular and molecular processes in vivo. Undoubtedly, the system biological character of molecular neuroimaging, which allows for the study of molecular events in the intact organism, will enhance our understanding of physiology and pathophysiology of the brain and improve our ability to diagnose and treat diseases more specifically. Technical/scientific challenges to be faced are the development of highly sensitive imaging modalities, the design of specific imaging probe molecules capable of penetrating the CNS and reporting on endogenous cellular and molecular processes, and the development of tools for extracting quantitative, biologically relevant information from imaging data. Today, molecular neuroimaging is still an experimental approach with limited clinical impact; this is expected to change within the next decade. This article provides an overview of molecular neuroimaging approaches with a focus on rodent studies documenting the exploratory state of the field. Concepts are illustrated by discussing applications related to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
White matter changes are indicative of white matter damage and demyelination caused by axonal tau pathology.
“Such observations are indicative of white matter damage and demyelination caused by axonal tau pathology [10].”
From Diffusion tensor imaging reveals whole-brain microstructural changes in the P301L mouse model of tauopathy. (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Wong, D. F., Rosenberg, P. B., Zhou, Y., Kumar, A., Raymont, V., Ravert, H. T., Dannals, R. F., Nandi, A., Brašić, J. R., Ye, W., et al. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.069088 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Shi, F., Liu, B., Zhou, Y., Yu, C., & Jiang, T. (2009) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20573 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Quantitative NMR measurements of hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease
Seab, J. P., Jagust, W. J., Wong, S. T. S., Roos, M. S., Reed, B. R., & Budinger, T. F. (1988) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910080210 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
19F and 1H MRI detection of amyloid β plaques in vivo
Higuchi, M., Iwata, N., Matsuba, Y., Sato, K., Sasamoto, K., & Saido, T. C. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1422 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Beyond
Pepeu, G., & Giovannini, M. (2009) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720509787602861 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
PK11195 labels activated microglia in Alzheimer's disease and in vivo in a mouse model using PET
Venneti, S., Lopresti, B. J., Wang, G., Hamilton, R. L., Mathis, C. A., Klunk, W. E., Apte, U. M., & Wiley, C. A. (2009) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.11.005 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Schwarz, A. J., Gozzi, A., Reese, T., & Bifone, A. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21179 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of β-amyloid neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease
Adlard, P. A., Tran, B. A., Finkelstein, D. I., Desmond, P. M., Johnston, L. A., Bush, A. I., & Egan, G. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00327 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Imaging of cerebrovascular pathology in animal models of Alzheimer's disease
Klohs, J., Rudin, M., Shimshek, D. R., & Beckmann, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00032 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationMassalimova, A., Ni, R., Nitsch, R. M., Reisert, M., von Elverfeldt, D., & Klohs, J. (2020) · Neurodegenerative Diseases · doi:10.1159/000515754 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Klohs, J., & Rudin, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Rudin, Markus
- Venue
- The Neuroscientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 539-559
- ISSN
- 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4098
- OpenAlex
- W2170920655
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Keywords
- molecular neuroimaging, non-invasive brain imaging, imaging agents, reporter gene assay, magnetic resonance imaging, scintigraphy, optical imaging, brain pathophysiology, Alzheimer's disease, rodent models, CNS penetration
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review