Cited by 56Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Do the Long-Term Consequences of Neglect Differ for Children of Different Races and Ethnic Backgrounds?

Widom, Cathy Spatz, Czaja, Sally, Wilson, Helen W., Allwood, Maureen, Chauhan, Preeti·2013·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Scant research has examined how children of different races or ethnic backgrounds manifest consequences of neglect. We examined multiple domains of functioning (academic/intellectual, social/behavioral, and psychiatric), three theories (racial invariance, double jeopardy, and resilience), and potential confounding variables. Children with documented cases of neglect (ages 0–11) and matched controls without such histories were followed up and interviewed in adulthood ( N = 1,039). The sample was 47.3% female, 62.4% White, 34.3% Black, and 3.4% Hispanic. Black and White neglected children showed negative consequences for IQ, reading ability, and occupational status compared to controls. Compared to same race and ethnic group controls, neglected White children showed extensive mental health consequences, Black children showed more anxiety and dysthymia, and Hispanic children showed increased risk for alcohol problems. Black and White neglected children differed in risk for violence compared to same race controls: Neglected Black children were arrested for violence two times more often than Black controls, whereas neglected White children were more likely than White controls to report engaging in violence. Findings provide some support for each theory (racial invariance, double jeopardy, and resilience). Understanding the factors that account for similarities and differences in consequences requires further investigation. Implications for research and policy are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559512460728

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Widom, C. S., Czaja, S., Wilson, H. W., Allwood, M., & Chauhan, P.
Affiliations
  • John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
Corresponding author
Widom, Cathy Spatz
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
2012-10-16
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
42-55
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2035460140
Cited by
56
References
76
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA11108, AA09238, R03AA009238, R21AA011108)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH58386, R01MH058386)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA17842, R01DA017842, R01DA010060, DA10060)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 40774, R01HD040774)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child neglect, racial and ethnic differences, long-term effects, double jeopardy, resilience, IQ, reading skills, occupational status, anxiety, dysthymia, alcohol problems, violence, arrests, Black children, white children, Hispanic children
MeSH terms
Aptitude, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Employment, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Infant, Intelligence, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Black People, White People, Racial Groups, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review