Cited by 233Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceResilience and Mental HealthChild Abuse and Trauma

Recovery: Resilience and Growth in the Aftermath of Domestic Violence

Anderson, Kim M., Renner, Lynette M., Danis, Fran S.·2012·Violence Against Women

Abstract

This mixed-methods study explored the recovery process and outcomes for 37 women formerly in an abusive intimate partner relationship. Standardized measures of current psychosocial functioning indicated participants were largely asymptomatic for posttraumatic stress disorder and had relatively strong resilience. Qualitative analysis revealed how social and spiritual support was instrumental to participants’ recovery, growth, and resilience. Implications for helping professionals include gaining a more comprehensive understanding of recovery from domestic violence. This type of knowledge may contribute to interventions that build on women’s strengths and resourcefulness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801212470543

Cites

47 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Asher M. B., 2001, Social Work Today, 1, 1
  2. Avdibegovic E., 2006, Croatia Medical Journal, 47, 731
  3. Derogatis L. R., 1994, SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual
  4. Landenburger K., 1998, Empowering survivors of abuse, 61
  5. Wagnild G. M., 1993, Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, K. M., Renner, L. M., & Danis, F. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2012-11
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1279-1299
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2152729253
Cited by
233
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, women survivors, resilience, post-traumatic stress disorder, social support, spiritual support, psychosocial functioning, strengths-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Growth, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Spouses, Spirituality, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review