Cited by 335Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Psychological Abuse: Implications for Adjustment and Commitment to Leave Violent Partners

Arias, Ileana, Pape, Karen T.·1999·Violence and Victims

Abstract

The contribution of psychological abuse, beyond that of physical abuse, to battered women’s psychological adjustment and their intentions to terminate their abusive relationships was examined. Sixty-eight battered women residing in shelters for battered women provided information on their: (1) physical and psychological abuse; (2) psychological symptomatology; (3) strategies for coping with and perceptions of control over partner violence; and (4) intentions to return to their abusive partners. Multiple regression analyses indicated that frequency and severity of physical abuse was not a significant predictor of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology nor of women’s intentions to terminate their abusive relationships. However, psychological abuse was a significant predictor of both PTSD symptomatology and intentions to permanently leave abusive partners even after controlling for the effects of physical abuse. PTSD symptomatology moderated the relationship between psychological abuse and intentions to terminate the abusive relationships: resolve to leave the abusive partner as a function of level of psychological abuse was significant only among women characterized by low levels of PTSD symptomatology. Greater use of emotion-focused coping strategies, absolutely and relative to problem-focused coping, had direct effects on PTSD symptomatology. However, neither coping nor perceptions of control moderated the effects of psychological abuse on psychological adjustment. The results of the investigation suggested that psychological abuse and ensuing PTSD symptomatology are important variables to assess among physically battered women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.55

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arias, I., & Pape, K. T.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Violence and Victims
Published
1999-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
55-67
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
OpenAlex
W132683574
Cited by
335
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa009224-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA09224-02S1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
psychological violence, intimate partner violence, battered women, psychological adjustment, leaving abusive relationships, post-traumatic stress disorder, coping strategies, emotion-focused coping, problem-focused coping, physical abuse
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Divorce, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Motivation, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Adjustment, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Battered Women, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review