Cited by 71Organizational Strategy and CultureOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesEthics in Business and Education

Establishing Values-Based Leadership and Value Systems in Healthcare Organizations

Graber, David R., Kilpatrick, Anne Osborne·2008·Journal of Health and Human Services Administration

Abstract

The importance of values in organizations is often discussed in management literature. Possessing strong or inspiring values is increasingly considered to be a key quality of successful leaders. Another common theme is that organizational values contribute to the culture and ultimate success of organizations. These conceptions or expectations are clearly applicable to healthcare organizations in the United States. However, healthcare organizations have unique structures and are subject to societal expectations that must be accommodated within an organizational values system. This article describes theoretical literature on organizational values. Cultural and religious influences on Americans and how they may influence expectations from healthcare providers are discussed. Organizational cultures and the training and socialization of the numerous professional groups in healthcare also add to the considerable heterogeneity of value systems within healthcare organizations. These contribute to another challenge confronting healthcare managers--competing or conflicting values within a unit or the entire organization. Organizations often fail to reward members who uphold or enact the organization's values, which can lead to lack of motivation and commitment to the organization. Four key elements of values-based leadership are presented for healthcare managers who seek to develop as values-based leaders. 1) Recognize your personal and professional values, 2) Determine what you expect…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/107937390803100202

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graber, D. R., & Kilpatrick, A. O.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Health and Human Services Administration
Published
2008-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
179-197
ISSN
  • 1079-3739 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-5509
OpenAlex
W2306033257
Cited by
71
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Human Services Administration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
values-based leadership, organizational values, healthcare organizations, organizational culture, value conflicts, professional socialization, stakeholder value, reward systems, employee motivation, health management
MeSH terms
Ethics, Institutional, Health Services Administration, Humans, Leadership, Social Values, United States, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review