The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Measurement of Green Workplace Behaviors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
The literature on the green behaviors adopted by individuals in workplace settings has grown significantly over the past decade. Many studies have examined the factors associated with individual actions. However, the comparability of the studies conducted on the subject is a common concern, mainly because of the wide range of measurement tools based on different sets of items used in such research. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the degree of methodological maturity of green workplace behaviors based on a systematic review of research published on the subject between 1977 and 2016. Five major trends were identified from the 53 papers reviewed as part of this research: (a) the predominance of scales for measuring “green office” behaviors, (b) the redundancy of certain items, (c) the limited efforts devoted to measuring counterproductive green behaviors, (d) the emergence of new subcategories of proenvironmental behaviors, and (e) and the abundance of scales measuring voluntary green behaviors (extra-role). Through an analysis of existing measurement tools, this article proposes a decision tree designed to help scholars choose appropriate items for their studies. This may, in turn, contribute to the literature on green workplace behaviors by reducing bias and limiting the unnecessary creation of new measurement scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time
Organ, D. W. (1997) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2 · Cited by 2,807
Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research
Morrison, E. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 · Cited by 1,803
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness
Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034531 · Cited by 731
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
Buscemi, N., Hartling, L., Vandermeer, B., Tjosvold, L., & Klassen, T. P. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010 · Cited by 464 · cited 1×
“This dual process of data extraction is crucial to a systematic review since it reduces the risk of error (Buscemi et al., 2006).”
BackgroundProgressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: The role of “Green” HRM
Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Redman, T. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.031 · Cited by 441
EREZ, A., BLOOM, M. C., & WELLS, M. T. (1996) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01801.x · Cited by 161
Saifulina, N., & Carballo‐Penela, A. (2017) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.1654 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review
Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660 · Cited by 907
Self-citationAftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3219 · Cited by 452
Yuriev, A. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71601 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Francoeur, V., Paillé, P., Yuriev, A., & Boiral, O.
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-42
- ISSN
- 1086-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7417
- OpenAlex
- W2939865381
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Measurement of Green Workplace Behaviors: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1086026619837125
- The paper
- Francoeur, V., Paillé, P., Yuriev, A., & Boiral, O. (2021). The Measurement of Green Workplace Behaviors: A Systematic Review. Organization & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619837125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.