Cited by 11Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

ADHD Symptom Rebound and Emotional Lability With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years

López, Frank A., Childress, Ann, Adeyi, Ben, Dirks, Bryan, Babcock, Thomas, Scheckner, Brian, Lasser, Robert A., Shepski, John +1 more·2017·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: To describe symptom rebound in children with ADHD treated with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) or placebo. Method: During a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of LDX, parents/caregivers completed the Conners’ Parent Rating Scale–Revised: Short Form symptom rating scale throughout the day. Response, rebound, and emotional lability (EL) were assessed post hoc based on predefined criteria. Results: Most participants given LDX ( n = 207) were responders throughout the day (50.7%-55.6%) versus placebo ( n = 72; 11.1%-22.2%). A total of seven (3.4%) LDX participants showed rebound in the afternoon and/or evening versus seven (9.7%) with placebo. In both groups, most incidences of rebound occurred in the evening. EL (mean) was higher in LDX rebounders and nonresponders (range = 4.2-9.0) versus LDX responders (range = 1.3-1.6) and versus placebo rebounders (range = 0.7-1.9). Conclusion: ADHD symptom rebound occurred in few participants (3.3%) given LDX (accompanied by clinically significant EL). Overall, more participants given LDX versus placebo responded throughout the day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054712474685

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Childress A., 2009, Poster presented at 56th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  2. Conners C. K., 2008, Conners 3rd Edition™: Manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López, F. A., Childress, A., Adeyi, B., Dirks, B., Babcock, T., Scheckner, B., Lasser, R. A., Shepski, J., & Arnold, V.
Affiliations
  • Children’s Developmental Center, Winter Park, FL, USA
  • Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (US)
  • Shire Development LLC, Wayne, PA, USA
  • Pharmanet/i3, an inVentiv Health clinical, Princeton, NJ, USA
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
López, Frank A.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
52-61
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2038262125
Cited by
11
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, emotional lability, children, stimulant medication, treatment response, diurnal variation
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Treatment Outcome, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review