The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks
Abstract
Social psychologists have studied the psychological processes involved in persuasion, conformity, and other forms of social influence, but they have rarely modeled the ways influence processes play out when multiple sources and multiple targets of influence interact over time. However, workers in other fields from sociology and economics to cognitive science and physics have recognized the importance of social influence and have developed models of influence flow in populations and groups—generally without relying on detailed social psychological findings. This article reviews models of social influence from a number of fields, categorizing them using four conceptual dimensions to delineate the universe of possible models. The goal is to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations to build models that incorporate the detailed, microlevel understanding of influence processes derived from focused laboratory studies but contextualized in ways that recognize how multidirectional, dynamic influences are situated in people's social networks and relationships.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the findings of local rules of opinion adaptation have not yet been used to study the collective dynamics of the system, and it remains unclear how social influence plays out in larger scale social contexts over time [31].”
From Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“As social influence among human group members may trigger individuals to revise their estimates (10), it can have a substantial impact on the statistical wisdom of crowd effect in societies.”
From How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect (2011) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abelson, R.P., 1964, Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy
- 10.1086/261849 · DOI
- Blanton, H., 2003, Psychology, 7, 115
- Hegselmann, R., 2002, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5
- Hogg, M.A. & Turner, J.C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent information influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Jin, M., 2001, Physics Review, 64, 381
- Katz, E., 1955, Personal influence
- Kennedy, J., 2001, Swarm intelligence
- Lifton, R.J., 1991, Cultic Studies Journal, 8, 1
- Milgram, S., 1967, Psychology Today, 1, 60
- Moss, S., 2005, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8
- Redner, S., 1998, European Physical Journal B—Condensed Matter, 4, 131
- Rojas, F., 2006, Contact patterns and aggregate opinion levels—Results from a simulation study
- Rolfe, M., Proceedings of the agent 2004 conference on Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity, and Emergence
- Schelling, T.C., 1969, American Economic Review, 59, 488
- Stauffer, D., 2001, Journal of Artificial and Simulated Societies
- Urbig, D., 2003, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6
- Walker, A., Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems
- Wolfram, S., 2002, A new kind of science
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–333 of 333
Cofie, L. E. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/3mkw-gk85
L’influence sur les réseaux, une proposition de modélisation
Nouvel, D., Deturck, K., Segond, F., & Patel, N. (2019) · Recherche d’information document et web sémantique · doi:10.21494/iste.op.2020.0465
Compulsive Internet Use among Students in Primary School: The Role of Parenting Monitoring
Kaur, N., & Ahmad, Y. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032074
Kaur, N., & Ahmad, Y. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032076
CHAOTIC MODES IN SCALE FREE OPINION NETWORKS
Kusmartsev, F. V., & Kürten, K. E. (2009) · doi:10.1142/9789814289153_0006
Opinion Dynamics with Heterogeneous Interactions and Information Assimilation
Mirtabatabaei, A., & Hespanha, J. P. (2013)
SISI GELAP SMARTPHONE: FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KETERGANTUNGAN DAN NIAT PEMBELIAN ULANG
Hadi, A. S. (2021) · Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis · doi:10.12928/fokus.v11i2.4601
Social Influence and the Emergence of Cultural Norms
Mäs, M., & Kitts, J. A. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1793
Fischer, P. A., Jander, K., & Krueger, J. I. (2018) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56739-5_6 · Cited by 2
(2020) · Pédagogies en développement. Série 6 : Pratiques méthodologiques · doi:10.3917/dbu.bonco.2020.01.0151
Conductance and influence-capital: modeling online social influence
Ram, R., & Rizoiu, M.-A. (2026) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00650-5
DAMPAK KEBUTUHAN SOSIAL DAN PENGARUH SOSIAL PADA PERILAKU PEMBELIAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PONSEL CERDAS
Hadi, A. S. (2021) · Jurnal Bisnis Darmajaya · doi:10.30873/jbd.v7i2.3088
BMA Algorithm for Smartphone Purchase Decisions
Cuong, D. T. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21435-6_4
Computational Modeling in Various Cognitive Fields
(2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108755610.027
Adams, J. (2023) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.239446
Reisinger, D., Vogrin, M., Wood, G. M. D. O., Schmickl, T., & Jäger, G. (2023) · Springer proceedings in complexity · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34920-1_22
Response Styles Improve Model Fit of Big FivePreprint
Bate, G., Obert, G. T., Anderson, K., & Miller, S. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4795386
Actitud sostenible hacia el emprendimiento
Solarte, C. M. S., Almeida, L. H. V., & Yépez, R. F. U. (2024) · Cuadernos Latinoamericanos de Administración · doi:10.18270/cuaderlam.4526
Entrepreneurial Influencers: Harnessing History to Guide Contemporary Opportunities
Ndinguri, E., & Hill, J. (2024) · Archives of Business Research · doi:10.14738/abr.1211.17890
Social networks that matter: Explaining the social participation of university students
de León, M. C. D., Zlobina, A., & Belli, S. (2024) · Citizenship Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1386/ctl_00167_1
Su, Q., Wei, Q., Xiao, J., Yan, J. H., & Cao, C. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251378397
Muir, K., Dewdney, N., Walker, F., & Joinson, A. (2025) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2025.2590842 · Cited by 1
The affective and relational bases of adolescent mathematics anxiety
Buckley, S. (2009)
Poß-Doering, R., Kamradt, M., Glassen, K., Andres, E., Kaufmann‐Kolle, P., & Wensing, M. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.11986197
Poß-Doering, R., Kamradt, M., Glassen, K., Andres, E., Kaufmann‐Kolle, P., & Wensing, M. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.11986203
Fu, Y., Su, S., Li, J., Yang, S., Lu, Z., & Tong, X. (2025) · International Conference on Human-Engaged Computing (ICHEC) · doi:10.1145/3786995.3787013
Usmani, S. (2025) · Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.46568/pjgs.v25i1.825
Influence of the majority group on individual judgments in online spontaneous conversations
Goglia, D., Vega, D., & Gandelli, A. (2026) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00668-9
Emotions as narrative anchors of armed group mobilization
Parida, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1928867
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-300
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2147167010
- Semantic Scholar
- 9a914f197cafce174d2ecfae2739d512f081ca90
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social influence, social networks, persuasion, conformity, interpersonal relationships
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Humans, Leadership, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review