The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks
Abstract
Social psychologists have studied the psychological processes involved in persuasion, conformity, and other forms of social influence, but they have rarely modeled the ways influence processes play out when multiple sources and multiple targets of influence interact over time. However, workers in other fields from sociology and economics to cognitive science and physics have recognized the importance of social influence and have developed models of influence flow in populations and groups—generally without relying on detailed social psychological findings. This article reviews models of social influence from a number of fields, categorizing them using four conceptual dimensions to delineate the universe of possible models. The goal is to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations to build models that incorporate the detailed, microlevel understanding of influence processes derived from focused laboratory studies but contextualized in ways that recognize how multidirectional, dynamic influences are situated in people's social networks and relationships.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the findings of local rules of opinion adaptation have not yet been used to study the collective dynamics of the system, and it remains unclear how social influence plays out in larger scale social contexts over time [31].”
From Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“As social influence among human group members may trigger individuals to revise their estimates (10), it can have a substantial impact on the statistical wisdom of crowd effect in societies.”
From How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect (2011) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. J. M. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,145
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,207
Threshold models of collective behavior
Granovetter, M. (1978) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226707 · Cited by 6,072
(2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.i · Cited by 5,542
Milgram, S. (1967) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e400002009-005 · Cited by 5,528
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
(1978) · Cited by 5,009
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
A Theory of Psychological Reactance
Torrance, E. P., & Brehm, J. W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420824 · Cited by 4,758
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,550
Dissertation Abstracts International
Kutler, S. I. (2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim010020122 · Cited by 4,190
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.
Snyder, M. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037039 · Cited by 3,525
The psychology of social impact
Latané, B. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.4.343 · Cited by 2,864
(1998) · Cited by 2,641
The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968) · Cited by 2,410
Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis and Simulation
Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,366
Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market
Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121066 · Cited by 2,231 · cited 1×
“Salganik, Dodds, and Watts (2006) argued that this pattern is a result of positive feedback from social influence: As individuals influence each other, success and failure are both amplified, producing the observed pattern of unpredictable but high variation.”
Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups
Bavelas, A. (1950) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906679 · Cited by 2,059
Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2.
Wagner, D. G., Higgins, E. T., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072281 · Cited by 1,970
The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization
Axelrod, R. (1997) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002797041002001 · Cited by 1,918
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 · Cited by 1,850
Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,843
The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign.
Britt, S. H. (1945) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0051801 · Cited by 1,837
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_01 · Cited by 1,776
Self-citationKleinberg, J. M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35022643 · Cited by 1,730
Network models of the diffusion of innovations
Valente, T. W. (1996) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/bf00240425 · Cited by 1,657
How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution
Redner, S. (1998) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1007/s100510050359 · Cited by 1,509
From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling
Macy, M. W., & Willer, R. (2002) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117 · Cited by 1,507
Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.
LEAVITT, H. J. (1951) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057189 · Cited by 1,355
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230995 · Cited by 1,250
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: explorations in massively parallel microworlds
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-3355 · Cited by 983
From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact.
Nowak, A. K., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.362 · Cited by 975
Schelling, T. C. (1969) · American Economic Review · Cited by 944
How do attitudes guide behavior
Fázio, R. H. (1986) · Cited by 903
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. R. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.284 · Cited by 881
Lippke, S. (2014) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483332222.n225 · Cited by 625
A Structural Theory of Social Influence: List of Tables and Figures
Friedkin, N. E. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527524 · Cited by 610
Collective Action and Network Structure
Gould, R. V. (1993) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095965 · Cited by 560
The social organization of distributed cognition.
Hutchins, E. L. (1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10096-012 · Cited by 552
Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36002-8 · Cited by 531
Self-citationStructure of growing social networks
Jin, E., Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.046132 · Cited by 508
Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: The AIDS example
Klovdahl, A. S. (1985) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(85)90269-2 · Cited by 495
Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes.
Wood, W., Lundgren, S. R., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323 · Cited by 479
Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity.
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.298 · Cited by 447
Subjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding
Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60333-0 · Cited by 404
Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology
Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294789 · Cited by 401
Self-citationHolman, T. B., & Gottman, J. M. (1995) · Family Relations · doi:10.2307/584749 · Cited by 399
Social networks and infectious disease: The Colorado Springs study
Klovdahl, A. S., Potterat, J. J., Woodhouse, D. E., Muth, J. B., Muth, S. Q., & Darrow, W. W. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90302-6 · Cited by 389
The Evolution of Trust and Cooperation between Strangers: A Computational Model
Macy, M. W., & Skvoretz, J. V. (1998) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657332 · Cited by 378
The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review.
Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracín, D. (2004) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143 · Cited by 343
What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other?
Smith, E. R. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.893 · Cited by 312
Self-citationKrackhardt, D. M., & Porter, L. W. (1985) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393107 · Cited by 304
Social identification effects in group polarization.
Mackie, D. M. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720 · Cited by 280
Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups
Burt, R. S. (1978) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/004912417800700205 · Cited by 276
Deviance Regulation: A Theory of Action and Identity
Blanton, H., & Christie, C. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.115 · Cited by 274
Shyness: Conceptualization and measurement.
Jones, W. H., Briggs, S. R., & Smith, T. G. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.629 · Cited by 263
Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity
Friedkin, N. E. (1984) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124184012003001 · Cited by 245
Jager, W., & Amblard, F. (2005) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-005-6282-2 · Cited by 240
What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other?
Smith, E. R. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.893 · Cited by 223
Self-citationComputer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making
Stasser, G. L. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5 · Cited by 210
Referent informational influence and group polarization
Turner, J. C., Wetherell, M. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1989) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00855.x · Cited by 186
Propagation of innovations in networked groups.
Mason, W., Jones, A., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0012798 · Cited by 180
Self-citationUnderstanding the Emergence of Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems
Walker, A. K., & Wooldridge, M. (1995) · Cited by 169
Janssen, M. A., & Jager, W. (2001) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(01)00063-0 · Cited by 163
Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups.
Stasser, G. L., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, G. H. (1989) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · Cited by 142
Cellular automata modeling of resistance to innovations: Effects and solutions
Moldovan, S., & Goldenberg, J. (2003) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/s0040-1625(03)00026-x · Cited by 114
Monin, B., & Norton, M. I. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203029005001 · Cited by 106
Causality in Social Network Analysis
Doreian, P. (2001) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124101030001005 · Cited by 94
Moss, S., & Edmonds, B. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 83
Experimental Evidence for Dynamic Social Impact: The Emergence of Subcultures in Electronic Groups
Latané, B., & Bourgeois, M. J. (1996) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01503.x · Cited by 80
Stasser, G. L. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2851 · Cited by 65
Attitude Dynamics with Limited Verbalisation Capabilities
Urbig, D. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 60
Prišlin, R., Limbert, W. M., & Bauer, E. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.385 · Cited by 56
Monte Carlo simulations of Sznajd modelsPreprint
Stauffer, D. (2002) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0202035 · Cited by 52
Prišlin, R., Limbert, W. M., & Bauer, E. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.385 · Cited by 49
A "sleeper" effect in opinion change.
Weiss, W. (1953) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0063200 · Cited by 47
McCann, C. D., Higgins, E. T., & Fondacaro, R. A. (1991) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.47 · Cited by 42
Gordijn, E., de Vries, N. K., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702236819 · Cited by 28
Spontaneous Group Formation in the Seceder Model
Dittrich, P., Liljeros, F., Soulier, A., & Banzhaf, W. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.3205 · Cited by 27
Computer simulation methods for social psychology.
Hastie, R., & Stasser, G. L. (2000) · Cited by 17
Propagation of innovations in networked groups
Mason, W., Jones, A., & Goldstone, R. L. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e633962013-508 · Cited by 12
Self-citationWolfson, L. B. (2002) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 11
Social networks and simulations
Rolfe, M. (2004) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abelson, R.P., 1964, Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy
- 10.1086/261849 · DOI
- Blanton, H., 2003, Psychology, 7, 115
- Hegselmann, R., 2002, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5
- Hogg, M.A. & Turner, J.C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent information influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Jin, M., 2001, Physics Review, 64, 381
- Katz, E., 1955, Personal influence
- Kennedy, J., 2001, Swarm intelligence
- Lifton, R.J., 1991, Cultic Studies Journal, 8, 1
- Milgram, S., 1967, Psychology Today, 1, 60
- Moss, S., 2005, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8
- Redner, S., 1998, European Physical Journal B—Condensed Matter, 4, 131
- Rojas, F., 2006, Contact patterns and aggregate opinion levels—Results from a simulation study
- Rolfe, M., Proceedings of the agent 2004 conference on Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity, and Emergence
- Schelling, T.C., 1969, American Economic Review, 59, 488
- Stauffer, D., 2001, Journal of Artificial and Simulated Societies
- Urbig, D., 2003, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6
- Walker, A., Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems
- Wolfram, S., 2002, A new kind of science
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect
Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., & Helbing, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008636108 · Cited by 1,017
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 577
Internet Research in Psychology
Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321 · Cited by 458
Self-citationPaluck, E. L., & Shepherd, H. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030015 · Cited by 417
Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation
Moussaïd, M., Kämmer, J. E., Analytis, P. P., & Neth, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078433 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-300
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2147167010
- Semantic Scholar
- 9a914f197cafce174d2ecfae2739d512f081ca90
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social influence, social networks, persuasion, conformity, interpersonal relationships
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Humans, Leadership, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review