The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review
Open accessAbstract
Although people have been shown to rely on feelings to make judgments, the conditions that moderate this reliance have not been systematically reviewed and conceptually integrated. This article addresses this gap by jointly reviewing moderators of the reliance on both subtle affective feelings and cognitive feelings of ease-of-retrieval. The review revealed that moderators of the reliance on affective and cognitive feelings are remarkably similar and can be grouped into five major categories: (a) the salience of the feelings, (b) the representativeness of the feelings for the target, (c) the relevance of the feelings to the judgment, (d) the evaluative malleability of the judgment, and (e) the level of processing intensity. Based on the reviewed evidence, it is concluded that the use of feelings as information is a frequent event and a generally sensible judgmental strategy rather than a constant source of error. Avenues for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“A third potential reason is that individuals generally have very little insight into the inner workings of their minds and often rely on lay theories to explain the outcome of their thinking (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977).”
Background(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 7×
“…feelings include experiential states that reflect activated content information or accompany cognitive processes, such as feelings of familiarity (e.g., Jacoby & Dallas, 1981) or the ease with which information can be retrieved from memory (ease-of-retrieval; e.g., Tversky & Kahneman, 1973).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDESCARTES' ERROR: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Marg, E. (1995) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03988.x · Cited by 8,118
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,141
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775
Cited by
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0608 · Cited by 646
Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management
Sun, W., Bocchini, P., & Davison, B. D. (2020) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3 · Cited by 491
Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.967183 · Cited by 336
Brashier, N. M., & Marsh, E. J. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807 · Cited by 288
Consumers’ Trust in Feelings as Information
Avnet, T., Pham, M. T., & Stephen, A. T. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/664978 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-05-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-141
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2110777499
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 201
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1088868310367640
- The paper
- Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2011). When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310367640
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
