Cited by 336Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Social InfluenceBehavioral Health and Interventions

Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes

Open access
Petty, Richard E., Briñol, Pablo·2015·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

This article addresses the multiple ways in which emotions can influence attitudes and persuasion via primary and secondary (meta-) cognition. Using the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion as a guide, we review evidence for five fundamental processes that occur at different points along the elaboration continuum. When the extent of thinking is constrained to be low, emotions influence attitudes by relatively simple processes that lead them to change in a manner consistent with the valence of the emotion. When thinking is constrained to be high, emotions can serve as arguments in favour of a proposal if they are relevant to the merits of the advocacy or they can bias thinking if the emotion precedes the message. If thinking is high and emotions become salient after thinking, they can lead people to rely or not rely on the thoughts generated either because the emotion leads people to like or dislike their thoughts (affective validation) or feel more confident or doubtful in their thoughts (cognitive validation). When thinking is unconstrained, emotions influence the extent of thinking about the persuasive communication. Although prior theories have addressed one or more of these fundamental processes, no other approach has integrated them into one framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2014.967183

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High arousal emotions like fear and excitement influence how a persuasion message is processed.

    “High arousal emotions like fear and excitement influence how a persuasion message is processed (Petty and Briñol 2015).”

    From Profiling consumers who reported mass marketing scams: demographic characteristics and emotional sentiments associated with victimization (2024) · cites this paper as Petty and Briñol 2015

    The “PETTY AND BRIÑOL” section (p. 15) says arousal has been proposed to increase or decrease processing of persuasive messages, depending on the circumstances. It does not establish the claim specifically for fear and excitement, and it says the mechanism by which arousal affects thinking remains unclear. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bornstein, R. F. (1989 ). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968 -1987. Psychological Bulletin , 106 , 265 -289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106. 2.265 · DOI
  2. Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009) . Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin , 135 (2), 183 -204. doi:10.1037/ a0013965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Petty, Richard E.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2031835292
Cited by
336
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion)
  • Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
attitudes, elaboration likelihood model, metacognition, emotional valence
MeSH terms
Attitude, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Models, Psychological, Persuasive Communication, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review