Cited by 104Memory Processes and InfluencesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Longitudinal investigation of source memory reveals different developmental trajectories for item memory and binding

Open access
Riggins, Tracy·2014·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The present study used a cohort-sequential design to examine developmental changes in children's ability to bind items in memory during early and middle childhood. Three cohorts of children (aged 4, 6, or 8 years) were followed longitudinally for 3 years. Each year, children completed a source memory paradigm assessing memory for items and binding. Results suggest linear increases in memory for individual items (facts or sources) between 4 and 10 years of age but that memory for correct fact/source combinations (indicative of binding) showed accelerated rates of change between 5 and 7 years. Taken together, these results suggest differences exist in developmental trajectories between the development of memory processes underlying successful item memory and processes underlying binding. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to longitudinal research examining autobiographical memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033622

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riggins, T.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Riggins, Tracy
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2014
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
449-459
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2121438550
Cited by
104
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HD-R01-28425, HD-R03-067425)
  • University of Maryland, College Park
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
source memory, item memory, binding, memory development, early childhood, middle childhood, developmental trajectories, autobiographical memory, children's memory
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Cohort Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review