The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service
Abstract
Given the significant, sustained growth in services experienced worldwide, Arizona State University’s Center for Services Leadership embarked on an 18-month effort to identify and articulate a set of global, interdisciplinary research priorities focused on the science of service. Diverse participation from academics in a variety of disciplines working in institutions around the world—in collaboration with business executives who lead organizations ranging from small startups to Global 1000 companies—formed the basis for development of the priorities. The process led to the identification of the following 10 overarching research priorities: • Fostering service infusion and growth • Improving well-being through transformative service • Creating and maintaining a service culture • Stimulating service innovation • Enhancing service design • Optimizing service networks and value chains • Effectively branding and selling services • Enhancing the service experience through cocreation • Measuring and optimizing the value of service • Leveraging technology to advance service For each priority, several important and more specific topic areas for service research emerged from the process. The intent is that the priorities will spur service research by shedding light on the areas of greatest value and potential return to academia, business, and government. Through academic, business, and government collaboration, we can enhance our understanding of service and create new knowledge to help tackle the most important opportunities and challenges we face today.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Building a new academic field—The case of services marketing
Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(05)80003-x · Cited by 373
The Development and Emergence of Services Marketing Thought
Brown, S. W., Fisk, R. P., & Jo Bitner, M. (1994) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564239410051894 · Cited by 281
Self-citationBishop, K., Bolan, G., Bowen, D. E., Cromack, C., Evans, S., Fisk, R. P., Ganz, W., Gregory, M., Johnston, R., Lemmink, J. G. A. M., et al. (2008) · University of Warwick · doi:10.82444/warw.33661336 · Cited by 265
Bitner, M. J., & Brown, S. W. (2008) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.003 · Cited by 181
Self-citation(2023) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm · Cited by 157
Embedding the New Discipline of Service Science
Ng, I. C. L., Maull, R., & Smith, L. (2011) · Service science: research and innovations in the service economy · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8270-4_2 · Cited by 86
What Is the Domain of Service Research?
Rust, R. T. (1998) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467059800100201 · Cited by 60
Exploring the Diversity of Service Worlds in the Service Economy
Barrett, M. I., & Davidson, E. (2008) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_1 · Cited by 40
Cited by
Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context
Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patrício, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515576315 · Cited by 1,469
Self-citationThe Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions
Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003 · Cited by 621
Characterizing Value as an Experience: Implications for Service Researchers and Managers
Helkkula, A., Kelleher, C., & Pihlström, M. (2012) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670511426897 · Cited by 605
The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science
Rust, R. T., & Huang, M.-H. (2014) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0836 · Cited by 578
Sweeney, J. C., Danaher, T. S., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515572128 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K. A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., Demirkan, H., & Rabinovich, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-01-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-36
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2128847913
- Cited by
- 1,544
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 295.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1094670509357611
- The paper
- Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K. A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., Demirkan, H., & Rabinovich, E. (2010). Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509357611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.