Cited by 70Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Pathways of Adaptation: Two Case Studies with One Evidence-Based Substance Use Prevention Program Tailored for Indigenous Youth

Open access
Ivanich, Jerreed D., Mousseau, Alicia C., Walls, Melissa, Whitbeck, Les, Whitesell, Nancy Rumbaugh·2020·Prevention Science

Abstract

Indigenous communities often face disproportionate challenges across a variety of health domains, and effective prevention strategies are sorely needed. Unfortunately, evidence is scant regarding what approaches are effective for these communities. A common approach is to take an evidence-based practice or program with documented effectiveness in other populations and implement it with Indigenous populations. While a science of intervention adaptation is emerging, there remains little guidance on processes for adaptation that strategically leverage both existing scientific evidence and Indigenous prevention strategies. In this paper, two case studies illustrate promising practices for adaptation, documenting the approaches of two research teams funded under the National Institutes of Health's initiative to support Intervention Research to Improve Native American Health (IRINAH). These teams worked with distinct Indigenous populations in the USA and Canada to culturally adapt the same prevention program, the Iowa Strengthening Families Program for Parents and Youth 10-14. The approaches of these two teams and the programs that resulted are compared and contrasted, and critical elements of adaptation in partnership with Indigenous communities are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-018-0914-5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Culturally grounded school-based programs report a significant reduction in alcohol use.

    “a significant reduction in alcohol use (Ivanich et al., 2020)”

    From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Ivanich et al., 2020

    The Case Study 1 adaptations section reports that ten- and eleven-year-olds who had not begun drinking were significantly less likely than controls to drink at one-year follow-up. It also reports little or no effect among adolescents who had already used alcohol. The passage describes a culturally adapted family program, not a school-based program, so the claim omits an important qualifier and misstates the setting. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The frameworks did not specify whether modifications were planned (i.e., adaptations) or unplanned, or allow investigators to consider modifications in conjunction with fidelity, a related but distinct implementation outcome.

    “The frameworks also did not specify whether modifications were planned (i.e., adaptations) or unplanned (e.g., [2, 4, 27]), or allow investigators to consider modifications in conjunction with fidelity, a related but distinct implementation outcome [1].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivanich, J. D., Mousseau, A. C., Walls, M., Whitbeck, L., & Whitesell, N. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • University of Montana (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Whitesell, Nancy Rumbaugh
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2018-06-06
Volume
21
Issue
S1
Pages
43-53
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2805840363
Cited by
70
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA035111, R01DA037177)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
intervention adaptation, substance use prevention, Indigenous youth, indigenous peoples, community partnerships, Native American health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Canada, Child, Health Promotion, Humans, Indians, North American, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Organizational Case Studies, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review