Cited by 59Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Feasibility of a Community Intervention for the Prevention of Suicide and Alcohol Abuse with Yup'ik Alaska Native Youth: The Elluam Tungiinun and Yupiucimta Asvairtuumallerkaa Studies

Open access
Mohatt, Gerald V., Fok, Carlotta Ching Ting, Henry, David, Allen, James·2014·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

The Elluam Tungiinun and Yupiucimta Asvairtuumallerkaa studies evaluated the feasibility of a community intervention to prevent suicide and alcohol abuse among rural Yup'ik Alaska Native youth in two remote communities. The intervention originated in an Indigenous model of protection, and its development used a community based participatory research process. Feasibility assessment aimed to assess the extent to which (1) the intervention could be implemented in rural Alaska Native communities, and (2) the intervention was capable of producing measurable effects. Scales maximally sensitive to change were derived from earlier measurement work, and the study contrasted implementation process and outcomes across the two communities. In one community, medium dose response effects ( d = .30–.50), with dose defined as number of intervention activities attended, were observed in the growth of intermediate protective factors and ultimate variables. In the other community, medium dose effects were observed for one intermediate protective factor variable, and small dose effects were observed in ultimate variables. Differences across communities in resources supporting intervention explain these contrasting outcomes. Results suggest implementation in these rural Alaska settings is feasible when sufficient resources are available to sustain high levels of local commitment. In such cases, measureable effects are sufficient to warrant a prevention trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-014-9646-2

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Culturally relevant practices implemented by culturally-informed staff, such as those in the Healing of the Canoe program and the Qungasvik model, can significantly improve outcomes when integrated into prevention efforts.

    “This aligns with the literature indicating that culturally relevant practices implemented by culturally-informed staff, such as those observed in the Healing of the Canoe program and the Qungasvik model, can significantly improve outcomes when integrated into prevention efforts (Donovan et al., 2015; Mohatt et al., 2014).”

    From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Mohatt et al., 2014

    The Method (Intervention Procedures; page unavailable) describes the Qungasvik as a culturally contextualized prevention toolbox, and the Discussion (Feasibility; page unavailable) describes implementation with local staff and community advisors. The Results (Measureable Effects; page unavailable) report positive associations between intervention dose and some outcomes, but this was a feasibility study, several effects were not significant, and it did not isolate the effect of culturally informed staff. The source therefore does not support the broader claim that those practices and staff significantly improve outcomes in prevention efforts generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding is particularly relevant in light of previous studies that emphasize the importance of community engagement and trust in the effectiveness of prevention programs.

    “This finding is particularly relevant in light of previous studies that emphasize the importance of community engagement and trust in the effectiveness of prevention programs (Mohatt et al., 2014).”

    From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Mohatt et al., 2014

    The Discussion section, “Implications of Contrasting Findings across Two Communities” (page unavailable), says community leadership and commitment were required for effective implementation and contrasts the communities’ levels of involvement. This supports the importance of community engagement in this intervention, but the passages do not identify trust as a factor in prevention-program effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Qungasvik program for Yup'ik Alaska Native young people used local cultural values and practices in its suicide prevention design and showed medium dose-response effects on protective factors.

    “The Qungasvik program for Yup’ik Alaska Native young people used local cultural values and practices in its design and approach to suicide prevention, and showed medium dose-response effects on protective factors (Mohatt et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Allen J Mohatt GV Beehler S Rowe HL (this issue) People Awakening: Collaborative research with Alaska Native communities to address alcohol use disorders and suicide related health disparities American Journal of Community Psychology
  2. Nunnally JC Bernstein IH 1994 Psychometric Theory New York, NY McGraw-Hill
  3. Rasmus S Mohatt GV Ebbesson G Alstrom D Hubalik N Moses C Nicolai D Elluam Tungiinun Community Planning Group, & Yupiucimta Asvairtuumallerkaa Community Planning Group (this issue) Grounding Intervention in Culture: Description of a Community Based Participatory Process of Community Intervention Development American Journal of Community Psychology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohatt, G. V., Fok, C. C. T., Henry, D., & Allen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Allen, James
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-21
Volume
54
Issue
1-2
Pages
153-169
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W1994427205
Cited by
59
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA016098, R01AA011446)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA037183)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM103325)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR061430)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R24MD001626)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
suicide prevention, alcoholism prevention, community-based intervention, community-based participatory research, intervention feasibility, protective factors, dose-response relationship, intervention implementation
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Alaska, Alcoholism, Child, Inuit, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Rural Population, Suicide, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review