Cited by 302Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Heart rate variability and risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Fang, Su-Chen, Wu, Yu-Lin, Tsai, Pei-Shan·2020·Biological Research For Nursing

Abstract

Lower heart rate variability (HRV) is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, although the extent of the association is uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies to elucidate the association between HRV and the risk of all-cause death or cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) during a follow-up of at least 1 year. We searched four databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and extracted the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) from eligible studies. We included 28 cohort studies involving 3,094 participants in the meta-analysis. Results revealed that lower HRV was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events; the pooled HR was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72, 3.00) and 1.41 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.72), respectively. In subgroup analyses, the pooled HR of all-cause death was significant for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but not for those with heart failure. The pooled HR for cardiovascular events was significant for the subgroup of patients with AMI and acute coronary syndrome but not for those with coronary artery disease and heart failure. Additionally, both time and frequency domains of HRV were significantly associated with risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events in patients with CVD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1099800419877442

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, S.-C., Wu, Y.-L., & Tsai, P.-S.
Affiliations
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
  • Department of Nursing, St. Mary’s Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Yilan
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Pei-Shan
Venue
Biological Research For Nursing
Published
2019-09-26
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
45-56
ISSN
  • 1099-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4175
OpenAlex
W2976770731
Cited by
302
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 13
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Research For Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
heart rate variability, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, cardiovascular disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, coronary artery disease, time-domain HRV, frequency-domain HRV
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Heart Failure, Heart Rate, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Cohort Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review