The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Learning: Mechanisms, Culture, and Feasibility
Abstract
The burgeoning literature on organizational learning attests to the considerable interest engendered by `organizational learning' and `learning organizations'. At the same time it indicates considerable confusion surrounding these subjects. We discuss four controversial issues regarding organizational learning: (1) What are the similarities and differences between individual and organizational learning? (2) What are the conditions that promote productive organizational learning? (3) When is organizational learning feasible? (4) How is organizational learning related to learning organizations? We suggest that (1) although individual and organizational learning involve information processing, they require different mechanisms to convert information to actionable knowledge at different (individual vs organizational) systemic levels; (2) productive organizational learning requires a learning culture that consists of commitment to learning, valid knowledge, transparency, issue orientation and accountability; (3) the feasibility of organizational learning is enhanced by high environmental uncertainty, high costs of potential error, high level of members' professionalism, and a strong leadership commitment to learning, (4) learning organizations are organizations that embed institutionalized learning mechanisms within a learning culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279103 · Cited by 3,385
Bounded rationality and organizational learning
Simon, H. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.125 · Cited by 3,028
Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections
Cohen, M. D. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.135 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003 · Cited by 2,232
Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002 · Cited by 1,268
Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00257.x · Cited by 394
Organizational learning to manage sustainable development
Siebenhüner, B., & Arnold, M. (2007) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.579 · Cited by 320
Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector
Goldfinch, S. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00778.x · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R.
- Venue
- Management Learning
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-196
- ISSN
- 1350-5076 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7307
- OpenAlex
- W2166873560
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 25.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Learning: Mechanisms, Culture, and Feasibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1350507600312003
- The paper
- Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational Learning: Mechanisms, Culture, and Feasibility. Management Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600312003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.